- Joined
- Dec 31, 2013
- Messages
- 26,890
- Reaction score
- 1
Depends on the bylaws on open burn of garbage and non organic materials
Any clue how hate speech laws in Canada deal with flag burning?
Depends on the bylaws on open burn of garbage and non organic materials
You really should fuck off though, with that nonsense. Some practically nonexistent burning of a gay flag that doesn't come from bigotry/hatred/intolerance? How much time does that corner-of-a-corner case deserve? None. U.S. flag burning can come from a lot of motivations (obviously, since it's a much larger symbol encompassing many more people and ideas, including the LGBT flag if you're keeping score).
It's far more likely that given 100 gay flag burnings and 100 U.S. flag burnings that the U.S. flag burnings are coming from a large variety of motivations, with hate/bigotry being a subset of those motivations, while on the other hand the gay flag burnings would be almost exclusively expressions of bigotry/hate.
And this is so obvious that it's not plausible you're that you're so stupid that you don't see it immediately. So I'll compliment your intelligence and just assume that religious bigotry gets you hard as fuck.
Other guys have expressed similar persecution fantasies or speculation, yeah. The premise is utterly ridiculous. It's not a remotely controversial or questionable issue. Of course it's legal to burn a rainbow flag.
Any clue how hate speech laws in Canada deal with flag burning?
There's no persecution fantasies here dude. Who's being persecuted? Where have I implied that anyone is? I'm not American, I know that it's legal to burn the national flag but is it a given that the legal protection would apply to other non-national symbols as well?
I said everything that needed to be said, and I won't permit you to hide behind obtuseness.No, I need not fuck off. Unlike you, I'm not afraid to explain myself. If you're asking whether I can see that bigotry could be a reason people would burn a rainbow flag, I surely acknowledge that.
But you have accused me of "defending horrible things". And I haven't defended anything other than flag burning. But you threw a tantrum when I asked you to clarify whether you find flag burning horrible. Pro tip, if you make a habit of leveling spurious denunciations at people, they're going to ask you what you mean.
So, do you find find flag burning horrible or not? And if not, then what horrible things have I defended here?
Legal in Canada under charter protection - the human rights commission would cry pretty hard over it, though.
If team tiki torch had a "gathering" to protest their grievances, and they burned a rainbow flag would you consider that hate speech?It's probably considered hate speech.
I said everything that needed to be said, and I won't permit you to behind obtuseness.
What you should do is answer how you think I would respond, in good faith, to your bad question. You have to do some of the lifting here.
No, I think you're stretching credulity yet again to defend-without-really-defending horrible behavior.
Yeah, but LGBT flag ?
Yeah, the standard Inga hunt for whatever you can get. Unfortunately your bloodhound nose is tuned to a nearer source of contamination, to which you naturally try to drag arguments.I've done all the lifting silly. You accused me of defending horrible things, but you refuse to say what those horrible things are. How is it obtuse to ask you what exactly you meant? What horrible things?
What's obtuse is spuriously accusing others of defending horrible things and then refusing to say what those horrible things are plainly.
Here's your quote.
Yes because liberals love isis.
You really are daft.
Flags desecration is not defined by national or territorial terms -- the wording is just flags and its protected. So long as you dont light it and throw it at lgbt people (or other acts of intimidation) its not illegal, outside of open burn / air quality violations.
Burning replica like effigies of people are not illegal and that seems like more of an intimidation factor than a flag.
Yeah, the standard Inga hunt for whatever you can get. Unfortunately your bloodhound nose is tuned to a nearer source of contamination, to which you naturally try to drag arguments.
No sale. You already know (on a lower level of understanding, but in the ballpark) what my answer to "is flag burning horrible" would be, and you are again in the corner of religious bigotry, leveraging all you can out of it. It's shit. It's mud. Take a shower.
This seems at odds with hate speech laws.
In Canada it likely is.It's probably considered hate speech.
Sounds simple and stupid, but I'm not surprised by it, and I'm not interested in your inevitably bad opinions about flag burning.It's a standard Inga hunt for Fawlty to explain his words. I don't know whether you think flag burning is horrible since you've run from the question, all while without a scintilla of self awareness you've called me obtuse and said I'm hiding. If I had to guess, I'd say you think burning American flags is fine but burning a rainbow flag is horrible. As for me, I don't think any flag burning is horrible. I think it can be offensive but I'd never describe a person defending flag-burning as defending horrible things.
Sounds simple and stupid, but I'm not surprised by it, and I'm not interested in your inevitably bad opinions about flag burning.
I already rebutted the equivalence of gay flag vs US flag burning in terms of motivation, so there is nowhere for this to go, except you hunting for your own ass.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_v._BlackAre there specific laws on the books about cross burning?
There was a tranny last year who burned one at UBC; and she/he/it only got a mischief fine because it was university property and under 5000 in value