- Joined
- Oct 30, 2017
- Messages
- 3,409
- Reaction score
- 0
She's quite overestimating her abilities.
J. Peterson Channel 4 Interview
- Thread starter Teppodama
- Start date
She's quite overestimating her abilities.
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
- Messages
- 18,290
- Reaction score
- 4,185
In fairness to her she was responding to the columnist who jokingly suggested she should sue to suppress the video and salvage her career
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2006
- Messages
- 6,240
- Reaction score
- 1,434
I bet she got PTSD after that debacle.
Maybe she should ask Dr. Peterson for some treatment sessions in his psychological clinic.
Maybe she should ask Dr. Peterson for some treatment sessions in his psychological clinic.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2007
- Messages
- 24,699
- Reaction score
- 5,307
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2006
- Messages
- 18,681
- Reaction score
- 14,877
Timestamped
"Because a lot of people listening to you will just say, I mean, are we going back to the dark ages here?"
"That's cuz they're actually not listening, they're just projecting what they think."
That entire interview in a nutshell.
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2009
- Messages
- 17,993
- Reaction score
- 8,123
Yeah.
I have a feeling Peterson just put a massive target on his back.
Can't have people reasonably, rationally and intelligently questioning accepted "truths".
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2007
- Messages
- 11,868
- Reaction score
- 875
Regardless of whether you agree or not with Peterson, one thing should be very clear from this interview:
She made it clear from the get go that she dislikes his views and that gender differences are demeaning. Her entire approach can be described as attributing opinions on Peterson that wasn't his. She tried to cleverly rephrase his arguments to make him look bad. She didn't want to use basic scientific measures like facts on a population level, she turned the latter into facts about individuals and painted it as bigotry.
This was a clear cut case of a journalist trying to bring shame on a person and bring him down.
What happened to basic and qualitative journalism that asks questions like: When? Were? How? Why?
She made it clear from the get go that she dislikes his views and that gender differences are demeaning. Her entire approach can be described as attributing opinions on Peterson that wasn't his. She tried to cleverly rephrase his arguments to make him look bad. She didn't want to use basic scientific measures like facts on a population level, she turned the latter into facts about individuals and painted it as bigotry.
This was a clear cut case of a journalist trying to bring shame on a person and bring him down.
What happened to basic and qualitative journalism that asks questions like: When? Were? How? Why?
