John Brennan colluded with foreign spies against Trump

If Trump has nothing to hide then he has no need to worry.
 
Foreign supplied intel of russian intelligence intercepts. As in they were spying on the Ruskies and Trump and the boys kept coming up on the tape.

I mean, how stupid do you have to be to not get that when you posted the article?

{<jordan}

More like they were spying on Americans involved in the Trump campaign, and forwarding the information to the Obama administration every time a Trump cabinet member communicated with a foreign diplomat in the aftermath of the election win. Which was a perfectly legal thing to do at the time.

And yet, despite all their foreign spying, they have yet to produce any real evidence of Russian collusion.

From the times:

At intelligence agencies, there was a push to process as much raw intelligence as possible into analyses, and to keep the reports at a relatively low classification level to ensure as wide a readership as possible across the government — and, in some cases, among European allies. This allowed the upload of as much intelligence as possible to Intellipedia, a secret wiki used by American analysts to share information.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/...column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news


So not only did they use a foreign agency to spy on Trumps people, they lowered the classification level to the point where anyone could have leaked it to the press.
 
More like they were spying on Americans involved in the Trump campaign, and forwarding the information to the Obama administration every time a Trump cabinet member communicated with a foreign diplomat in the aftermath of the election win. Which was a perfectly legal thing to do at the time.

And yet, despite all their foreign spying, they have yet to produce any real evidence of Russian collusion.

From the times:

At intelligence agencies, there was a push to process as much raw intelligence as possible into analyses, and to keep the reports at a relatively low classification level to ensure as wide a readership as possible across the government — and, in some cases, among European allies. This allowed the upload of as much intelligence as possible to Intellipedia, a secret wiki used by American analysts to share information.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/...column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news


So not only did they use a foreign agency to spy on Trumps people, they lowered the classification level to the point where anyone could have leaked it to the press.

Yeah, none of that supports that editorialized garbage you posted in the OP.

Stop it. Get some help.
 
More like they were spying on Americans involved in the Trump campaign, and forwarding the information to the Obama administration every time a Trump cabinet member communicated with a foreign diplomat in the aftermath of the election win. Which was a perfectly legal thing to do at the time.

And yet, despite all their foreign spying, they have yet to produce any real evidence of Russian collusion.

From the times:

At intelligence agencies, there was a push to process as much raw intelligence as possible into analyses, and to keep the reports at a relatively low classification level to ensure as wide a readership as possible across the government — and, in some cases, among European allies. This allowed the upload of as much intelligence as possible to Intellipedia, a secret wiki used by American analysts to share information.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/...column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news


So not only did they use a foreign agency to spy on Trumps people, they lowered the classification level to the point where anyone could have leaked it to the press.

Actually our government has been known to ask for spied domestic communications WITHIN the US from foreign allies to get around our laws here.
 
Yeah, none of that supports that editorialized garbage you posted in the OP.

Stop it. Get some help.

LOL

American allies, including the British and the Dutch, had provided information describing meetings in European cities between Russian officials — and others close to Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — and associates of President-elect Trump, according to three former American officials who requested anonymity in discussing classified intelligence.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/...column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

Yeah it doesn't support anything.

Other than the fact Obama administration used foreign agencies, then preserved and declassified all the data so that scrubs like Reality Winner can leak it to your shitty newspapers.
 
Unnamed sources

Fuck all of them
 
One of my biggest disappointments with Trump is that he is letting all this corrupt shit slide. He'll sit around and bitch about Obama's DOJ spying on him on twitter, but he won't appoint a special counsel to do something about it.
 
LOL

American allies, including the British and the Dutch, had provided information describing meetings in European cities between Russian officials — and others close to Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — and associates of President-elect Trump, according to three former American officials who requested anonymity in discussing classified intelligence.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/...column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

Yeah it doesn't support anything.

Other than the fact Obama administration used foreign agencies, then preserved and declassified all the data so that scrubs like Reality Winner can leak it to your shitty newspapers.

You really should read that article in full before you post it again.

"Separately, American intelligence agencies had intercepted communications of Russian officials, some of them within the Kremlin, discussing contacts with Trump associates."
...
The opposite happened with the most sensitive intelligence, including the names of sources and the identities of foreigners who were regularly monitored. Officials tightened the already small number of people who could access that information. They knew the information could not be kept from the new president or his top advisers, but wanted to narrow the number of people who might see the information, officials said.

{<jordan}

Literacy is for the gays in Trumpworld. You don't need none of that feggy stuff like accuracy or evidence, git it out!
 
One of my biggest disappointments with Trump is that he is letting all this corrupt shit slide. He'll sit around and bitch about Obama's DOJ spying on him on twitter, but he won't appoint a special counsel to do something about it.
Presidents can't appoint them
 
One of my biggest disappointments with Trump is that he is letting all this corrupt shit slide. He'll sit around and bitch about Obama's DOJ spying on him on twitter, but he won't appoint a special counsel to do something about it.

A notable side effect of being full of shit, and a spoilt coward with no principles.
 
You really should read that article in full before you post it again.

"Separately, American intelligence agencies had intercepted communications of Russian officials, some of them within the Kremlin, discussing contacts with Trump associates."
...
The opposite happened with the most sensitive intelligence, including the names of sources and the identities of foreigners who were regularly monitored. Officials tightened the already small number of people who could access that information. They knew the information could not be kept from the new president or his top advisers, but wanted to narrow the number of people who might see the information, officials said.

{<jordan}

Literacy is for the gays in Trumpworld. You don't need none of that feggy stuff like accuracy or evidence, git it out!

LOL. U don't understand what you just posted!!

The intelligence agencies tightened up when it came to sources because they did not want the NEW(TRUMP) administration to know who ordered and how they were spied on. You really don't understand?

They laxed the rules to unmask!
But tightened the rules to find out how the people were spied on

It's breathtaking that you would call someone dumb when you are the one actually not understanding what u are reading.

DOES NOT MATTET THOUGH BECAUSE IT IS ALL UNNAMED BULLSHIT
 
LOL. U don't understand what you just posted!!

The intelligence agencies tightened up when it came to sources because they did not want the NEW(TRUMP) administration to know who ordered and how they were spied on. You really don't understand?

They laxed the rules to unmask!
But tightened the rules to find out how the people were spied on

They knew the information could not be kept from the new president or his top advisers, but wanted to narrow the number of people who might see the information, officials said.

<puh-lease75>

You earned the full song, stupid.



I could do this shit in my sleep lmfao.
 
You really should read that article in full before you post it again.

"Separately, American intelligence agencies had intercepted communications of Russian officials, some of them within the Kremlin, discussing contacts with Trump associates."
...
The opposite happened with the most sensitive intelligence, including the names of sources and the identities of foreigners who were regularly monitored. Officials tightened the already small number of people who could access that information. They knew the information could not be kept from the new president or his top advisers, but wanted to narrow the number of people who might see the information, officials said.

{<jordan}

Literacy is for the gays in Trumpworld. You don't need none of that feggy stuff like accuracy or evidence, git it out!

Lol, and what happened after they spied on foreign diplomats during the transitional period when they were guaranteed to talk to Trump cabinet members? Oh that's right, we found out how Obama administration used their positions to unmask names of political opponents.

Not only did they use foreign agencies to spy on Trumps people, but they also used Brennan's CIA to spy on foreign diplomats and then used Samantha Power to unmask the names of Americans in those comms lol. They were crooked on every level, and you are pointing it out thinking you're making a good point here.

The joke is on you bud! <Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo>




Obama ambassador's testimony on intelligence unmasking raises new questions
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ricans-on-almost-daily-basis-sources-say.html

Samantha Power, the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, was 'unmasking' at such a rapid pace in the final months of the Obama administration that she averaged more than one request for every working day in 2016 – and even sought information in the days leading up to President Trump’s inauguration, multiple sources close to the matter told Fox News.

Two sources, who were not authorized to speak on the record, said the requests to identify Americans whose names surfaced in foreign intelligence reporting, known as unmasking, exceeded 260 last year. One source indicatedthis occurred in the final days of the Obama White House.

The details emerged ahead of an expected appearance by Power next month on Capitol Hill. She is one of several Obama administration officials facing congressional scrutiny for their role in seeking the identities of Trump associates in intelligence reports – but the interest in her actions is particularly high.


Gowdy: Former UN Ambassador Samantha Power claims others unmasked in her name
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/18/gowdy-former-un-ambassador-samantha-power-claims-others-unmasked-in-her-name.html
Former President Barack Obama’s ambassador to the United Nations has testified that others made so-called unmasking requests in her name, House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy said Tuesday.

“Her testimony is they may be under my name, but I did not make those requests,” Gowdy said of former Ambassador Samantha Power during an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier on "Special Report with Bret Baier."

Power is among the Obama administration figures who made requests to identify Americans whose names surfaced in foreign intelligence reporting, known as unmasking.
 
I'm not sure if that's true. But in any case, he could direct Sessons to.

They can't.

Yes. He should appoint sessions to unless he fully trusts him to investigate it
 
Lol, and what happened after they spied on foreign diplomats during the transitional period when they were guaranteed to talk to Trump cabinet members? Oh that's right, we found out how Obama administration used their positions to unmask names of political opponents.

Not only did they use foreign agencies to spy on Trumps people, but they also used Brennan's CIA to spy on foreign diplomats and then used Samantha Power to unmask the names of Americans in those comms lol. They were crooked on every level, and you are pointing it out thinking you're making a good point here.

The joke is on you bud! <Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo>




Obama ambassador's testimony on intelligence unmasking raises new questions
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ricans-on-almost-daily-basis-sources-say.html

Samantha Power, the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, was 'unmasking' at such a rapid pace in the final months of the Obama administration that she averaged more than one request for every working day in 2016 – and even sought information in the days leading up to President Trump’s inauguration, multiple sources close to the matter told Fox News.

Two sources, who were not authorized to speak on the record, said the requests to identify Americans whose names surfaced in foreign intelligence reporting, known as unmasking, exceeded 260 last year. One source indicatedthis occurred in the final days of the Obama White House.

The details emerged ahead of an expected appearance by Power next month on Capitol Hill. She is one of several Obama administration officials facing congressional scrutiny for their role in seeking the identities of Trump associates in intelligence reports – but the interest in her actions is particularly high.


Gowdy: Former UN Ambassador Samantha Power claims others unmasked in her name
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/18/gowdy-former-un-ambassador-samantha-power-claims-others-unmasked-in-her-name.html
Former President Barack Obama’s ambassador to the United Nations has testified that others made so-called unmasking requests in her name, House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy said Tuesday.

“Her testimony is they may be under my name, but I did not make those requests,” Gowdy said of former Ambassador Samantha Power during an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier on "Special Report with Bret Baier."

Power is among the Obama administration figures who made requests to identify Americans whose names surfaced in foreign intelligence reporting, known as unmasking.

Yeah, none of that supports that editorialized garbage you posted in the OP.

Stop it. Get some help.
 
They knew the information could not be kept from the new president or his top advisers, but wanted to narrow the number of people who might see the information, officials said.

<puh-lease75>

You earned the full song, stupid.



I could do this shit in my sleep lmfao.

OMG dude! You just posted what I said! Why is this hard for you?

They KNEW the next administration would find out they were spying and unmasking so they made it HARDER to find out how and who spied.

Seriously, you are posting stuff to prove yourself wrong!! U are just reading it wrong and getting things confused!!

The shit you are posting about has nothing NOTHING to do with spying or unmasking!! What u are posting is saying they made it harder to find out why and how they were spied on.

I would suggest you just stop. U are literally posting things that prove u are wrong
 
Yeah, none of that supports that editorialized garbage you posted in the OP.

Stop it. Get some help.

Lol keep telling yourself that.

iu


You know what the best part about all this is? Despite your precious Obama administration colluding with foreign intelligence agencies and parties of interest, despite the shady misuse of Ambassador powers to unmask and spy on American political opponents, you still accomplished sweet fuck all lol! Where is the evidence of Trump collusion or Trump crime? You would think that all these crooked tactics would have gotten you guys some real dirt, but NOPE!

No #impeachburger

All they have proven is their own corruption, and how far they were willing to go to stay in power.
 
Back
Top