You think I am going to change my mind, because you presented numbers that you assume will shock me? LOL
The numbers suggests that Anthony Johnson is better at getting the takedown (in an MMA fight) compared to Daniel Cormier.
However, Daniel Cormier has attempted more takedowns than Rumble Johnson (38 vs 33), so we need to do inferential statistics to determine whether or not the difference in success is statistically significant.
Conclusion, from a descriptive statistical analysis, it looks like Anthony Johnson is better at takedowns than Daniel Cormier. However, we have have to be careful about how much can be inferred from these numbers, until we do some inferential statistics.
So, we can say that Anthony Johnson is better at getting the takedown than Daniel Cormier, based on his better rate of success compared to Daniel Cormier. Based on the best available evidence (the evidence can be weak or strong, and in this specific case, it is weak, but better than nothing).
To say that Daniel Cormier is better at getting the takedown than Anthony Johnson is NOT supported by any objective evidence (no matter how weak of strong).
More logic, statistics, science and emotional intelligence will make the world a better place. Basing one's world view on superficial optics and emotions is the root of all evil.