khabib's win over michael johnson is meaningless

mcdowels

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
4,795
Reaction score
413
Khabib fans keep talking about his win over Michael johnson, as if that was impressive.

But Michael johnson is not a good fighter and has a terrible record. it has caused an over estimiation of khabib's abilities

upload_2018-10-6_13-3-18.png blue1.jpg D2F734E9-70E4-4A55-A2E7-018E3BE80E4E-3879-00000233A1E1385B.JPEG
 
But Conor's humiliating loss to short notice journeyman Nate Diaz isn't meaningless, though.

espnapi_dm_160306_diaz_mcgregor_hl_wmain.jpg
 
But Michael johnson is not a good fighter and has a terrible record.
I think its the opposite, MJ is a good fighter with a terrible record because of his terrible fight IQ.

You dont beat Barboza, Poirier, Tony etc being a "not good" fighter.
 
Records aren't everything. MJ is a dangerous fighter and a good win. Same as Nate Diaz.
 
I don't know that people zoom into the MJ fight in particular. It was just hyped up by a few Khabib haters.
 
I've seen enough of khabib to properly label tonight's fight THEE 2 best lightweights in UFC. For me, really interested to see how much size /weight conor was able to put on in day and a half .Big factor for me .
 
Back
Top