Ah yes, you're the kind of guy that argues that we can't criticize MMA fighters because we're not pro fighters.You mean compared to other fighters at best, because he's still a pro fighter, something that most people would be afraid of.
Ah yes, you're the kind of guy that argues that we can't criticize MMA fighters because we're not pro fighters.
Fighters that fail to make weight and beat up & injure training partners are mentally weak.
Iq ? Ah you are trolling, i get it nowEach to his own.. I geninuely believe that Khamzat is ''arguably'' technically one of the best fighters to have graced the octagon. His one round finishes are purely based on technical ability and IQ. IMHO he beats Whitaker and Dricus back to back and would be favourite against both.. Then people will start to act as if this guy all of sudden fell from the sky but that is not true because we already know he has the potential and skills
What statement? Whittaker gets rocked in almosy every fight and is getting there in age and fight milage, he is still obviously a fantastic fighter but this isn't 2020 Reaper we talking about.