- Joined
- Apr 18, 2007
- Messages
- 15,718
- Reaction score
- 864
I don’t follow? These stories are part of their culture.Dude it's obviously just third world people that make 10 cents a day trying to make a few dollars
I don’t follow? These stories are part of their culture.Dude it's obviously just third world people that make 10 cents a day trying to make a few dollars
Obviously I’m not talking about literal dragons. I’m postulating that dragon myths come from dinosaurs. “Dinosaur” is a relatively new word. Ancient people would not have called them that.
Those examples I listed are from disparate cultures that describe very similar animals that fit the description of known dinosaurs.
I don’t follow? These stories are part of their culture.
You’re missing my point or perhaps I’m not making it clear. These cultures, spread far and wide, have stories and descriptions of very similar creatures. Why do you think that might be?There is no difference between this and ghosts, leprechauns, fairies, etc. Lol just because a culture has stories doesnt mean they are real.
We disagree about Behemoth (and Leviathan). The descriptions do not fit well with animals thought to have existed with modern man. Even secular scholars agree with that.They are not similar at all. Behemoth is a non-descript large creature that could be describing literally anything. The descriptions of Mokele-mbembe and Yarru are all over the place and pretty modern myths at that. These aren't even ancient people we are talking about. The Congo and Aboriginal stories have sprung up relatively recently.
If I tell an urban legend passed down from my grandfather about a lake monster, that doesn't imply it existed or that it is a dinosaur. There are people telling fictional stories all over the world.
You’re missing my point or perhaps I’m not making it clear. These cultures, spread far and wide, have stories and descriptions of very similar creatures. Why do you think that might be?
We disagree about Behemoth (and Leviathan). The descriptions do not fit well with animals thought to have existed with modern man. Even secular scholars agree with that.
They are similar in that they all describe what could be dinosaurs. They wouldn’t be exactly the same, of course (though they are more similar than you are suggesting), because they are likely describing different animals.The examples you came up with aren't even similar. You're asking why cultures all over the world have stories of seeing large, non-descript creatures? Because no shit Sherlock. Because me and you and every other kid fantasized about that shit when we were 8, including all the other people all over the world.
The problem is with the tail though, isn’t it?https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behemoth
"Since the 17th century CE there have been many attempts to identify Behemoth. Some scholars have seen him as a real creature, usually the hippopotamus, occasionally the elephant, rhinoceros, or water buffalo."
The problem is with the tail though, isn’t it?
I’m genuinely not sure. I’m open minded.You're a young earth creationist aren't you?
They are similar in that they all describe what could be dinosaurs.
Of course we fantasized about dragons. Because, at some point, we were introduced to them. They didn’t spring forth from individual imaginations. My question is where did the near cultural universal idea of dragons come from? I’m suggesting it came from dinosaurs that our ancestors saw and about which they told stories which eventually became “dragons.”
You are absolutely missing my point. I’m not going to try to explain it to you again.If you limit dinosaur to "large creature". Sure, you could say that. That's stupid though. No, they are not similar. You're reaching hard.
You can't be this ignorant. The idea of dragons has been around for thousands of years. You're bringing up modern myths.
Or there were actual dragons at some point, since many cultures have tails of them.Dinosaur bones are the reason for many dragon and mythical creature references, myths and stories. Not all but many.
Of course we fantasized about dragons. Because, at some point, we were introduced to them. They didn’t spring forth from individual imaginations
But imaginations from all over the world producing the same fictional creature? Seems doubtful. Why is it so hard to believe that these myths MIGHT be rooted in truth?The assumption that an imagination can't produce something without being introduced to it is completely incorrect. The human imagination has imagined COUNTLESS creatures it's never encountered. And you're also ignoring the very simple possibility that someone saw a lizard and a bird and thought "hey you know what would be neat....".
The suggestion that humans couldn't write of these creatures without encountering some version of them is just patently incorrect, and easily disproved by 90% of science-fiction from the last 40 years.
Watch the show River Monsters. There's a lot of cool things under the water, certainly more interesting than blurry distorted images of geese
The aliens that walked off the spaceship. You seriously believe in dragons? That's crazy. It's aliens.You are absolutely missing my point. I’m not going to try to explain it to you again.
Where do you think the idea of dragons came from?