Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'The War Room' started by phoenixikki, Mar 13, 2018.
Clear cut case of attack helicopter-phobia.
The fact that she has any "extremist" label associated with her is criminal.
This is the diseased marriage of Leftists and Islam. Criticism is violence to them. Yet they have hate preachers teaching and preaching specific, pointed violence and racist hate, jihad travelers left right and center, Antifa and BLM everywhere.
Lauren says nothing extreme at all. She simply is a reporter of sorts who criticizes Islam and mass immigration from time to time.
How long until the UK is Turkey? Or Pakistan? Who knows at this rate.
Personally, I wouldn't find any pride in my ancestors comitting genocide.
It doesn't really matter in the end I guess, since North America will have a white minority in a generation or two. You'll never stop immigration no matter how hard you try.
Seems that I should be more afraid of a white wacko Christian going on a shooting spree as its much more common in North America compared to Muslims killing people.
And BOOM he's gone from the thread.
I choose option C. Afraid of neither because I'm not a pussy like you.
Lol Jesus christ
So it's in the nationalist interest of the UK to allow in jihadists and grooming gangs?
Different culture; hard to judge?
The real crime of Lauren Southern is working together with Mike Cernobitch tho
What race is a Muslim?
According to the people of the UK, it is. She should respect national interest.
But there's almost no one who preaches a true open border philosophy. The most that's presented is that there isn't a need to change current immigration standards. Juxtaposed against those who say more restrictions are necessary. The "open border" counterarguments are pretty much fallacious strawmen.
So, the irony doesn't actually go both ways since the UK is only applying it's current standards while the denied foreigner is suggesting that a more open policy should be applied.
Do you mean people who violently act against my principle or people who violently act against people whose speech flies counter to my principles.
And are we speaking about past acts by an individual as in "Person A has actually spoken against my principles." Vs. "Person B who has actually acted violently in the past." Or are we speaking about future actions of a group of people "Group A might speak against my principles in the future." vs. "Group B might act violently in the future."
She has stated that she does not want a group of people (Muslims) in the West because their beliefs clash with the value system. Hence the humor and irony of her being denied access to a country because her beliefs clash with the value system of the country she was trying to enter.
Of course, if people want to spot reduce her position to "things like Pakistani rape gangs" then I suppose they could. They'd be wrong about her position but they could certainly make that choice.
No, he is talking about choosing between people who want to call you names and people who want to slaughter you.
Are there people who actually want to slaughter me? Goodness!!
We should certainly keep those specific individuals out. Right? The specific individuals and not every random person who shares a place of birth, a common language, a similar name, or the same umbrella religion.
Because if it's the latter then what do I do about people who share a place of birth, common language, similar name structures or the same umbrella religion as white supremacists who might also want to harm me?
Are we keeping them out too?
People who violently act against your principles
Spoken against vs Acted against - Past vs Past
Speaking against vs Acted against - Present vs Past
Speaking against vs Acting against - Present vs Present
Likely to Speak against vs Likely to Act against - Future vs Future
Anyway here is official paper.
Officially they didn't let her in for being "racist toward muslims". Stupid cunts, muslim isn't a race.
Here is another journalist who was detained for 3 days because she was going to interview Tommy Robinson and because her boyfriend belongs to "right wing organisation".
Read it, they didn't even claim it was extreme right.
(I'm rolling my eyes pretty hard right now.)
I'm not the one crying about Muslims.
Why would you call me a pussy? Are you flexing your keyboard muscles before your mom brings your pizza pockets down to the basement for you?
It was clear what you asked. He is just acting stupid and twisting words because it doesn't fit his agenda.