- Joined
- Oct 27, 2005
- Messages
- 28,902
- Reaction score
- 15,562
Harvey Weinstein?
He actually has a rock solid alibi. He was raping some girl in NYC after he promised her a role as an extra in his upcoming trial.
Harvey Weinstein?
The only thing I really have to add to this back and forth is that a rape via refugee actually is more egregious because the refugee should have not been in the country in the first place therefore the rape would have literally never happened. It's enough work as it is reducing the sexual assault rates by the native population without adding in a foreign population that itself commits the crime more than the native population.
what's the connection?But trump was mean to people!!!
serious question, do you have numbers that prove that the majority of sex crimes in Europe are committed by 'Asians'?No one is denying that. What you and others on your side are denying is that right now in Europe the majority of sex crimes are happening by Asians. Period. By deflecting to American statistics you are showing support for the European rapists by minimizing their crimes as insignificant. In the scope of America, yea they are, but in the scope of the UK or Europe that is not insignificant. Not in the least.
It is also unfair to say we dont care about rape in the US. I know i do, i hate all cases of it equally. I had a close family member that was drugged and raped, it screwed her up for years.
Harvey Weinstein?
holy shit that quote, verbatim, was actually saidAfter a polish girl was gang raped in Italy by one Congolese and two north-african men, a Muslim 'cultural mediator' for an Italian migrant-reception cooperative said on facebook that rape was "a worse act, but only at the beginning, when the willy goes in, then the woman becomes calm and you enjoy it like normal intercourse".
It's fair to criticize when people, who claim to care about some issue, don't actually care about the thing, but instead about the identity of the people doing the thing, or some other purely political consideration. The easiest example of this is presidential divisiveness. Almost zero people who claimed Obama was divisive actually give the first fuck about divisiveness, as nearly zero of them even acknowledge that Trump's divisiveness is so extreme- and the ones who do will claim that it's a good thing. With rape, one thing we have is a reaction-to-a-reaction situation with college rape. There's a ton of it. But it was overreacted to by political opponents, so that voids the entire problem of college rape, by some sorcery. The politics of the rape is clearly a more important consideration than the collective crime of rape.As I say in every muthafuckin thread about rape by “Asians” in Europe, rape rate in the US is SINGNIFICANTLY higher than any country in Europe (except Sweden whose statistics are completely broken).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics#By_country
So, if you are regularly outraged by stories like this, BUT somehow don’t find yourself getting similarly outraged (on an even more frequent basis) about stories of rape right here in the US...
>>You don’t care about women. You care about outrage porn.p>
I know I will get flamed for this and no one will offer a substantive response.
That’s OK. That’s the way it goes. The price for stating the unpopular truth.
There's nothing wrong with your advice, but I would guess you gave it at a bad time if it got that reaction. If the topic is rape prevention, then nobody should take offense. But if rape prevention is put into another topic, it should be really easy to see how that would be taken as victim blaming. It's like the difference between somebody in the 60s telling a black person he should avoid certain parts of town after dark, out of concern for that individual's safety, and telling a group of black people who are discussing racial violence that maybe they shouldn't be out at night. It's one of those things where the context means everything.I remember being in a 400 level poli sci course and the topic of rape came up and I made a comment that people should walk in groups after a night out and have at the very least pepper-spray to protect themselves and got SCREECHED at for blaming the victim.
I get people make stupid decisions when drunk but for fuck sakes... be in a group of 2-4 at least. It's like "do you wear a seatbelt when you drive? You do because you don't plan on getting in a wreck but just in case."
Sorry for kinda ranting off topic.
I would get that but it was a discussion on just the topic in general and what could be done about the problem.There's nothing wrong with your advice, but I would guess you gave it at a bad time if it got that reaction. If the topic is rape prevention, then nobody should take offense. But if rape prevention is put into another topic, it should be really easy to see how that would be taken as victim blaming. It's like the difference between somebody in the 60s telling a black person he should avoid certain parts of town after dark, out of concern for that individual's safety, and telling a group of black people who are discussing racial violence that maybe they shouldn't be out at night. It's one of those things where the context means everything.
I remember being in a 400 level poli sci course and the topic of rape came up and I made a comment that people should walk in groups after a night out and have at the very least pepper-spray to protect themselves and got SCREECHED at for blaming the victim.
I get people make stupid decisions when drunk but for fuck sakes... be in a group of 2-4 at least. It's like "do you wear a seatbelt when you drive? You do because you don't plan on getting in a wreck but just in case."
Sorry for kinda ranting off topic.
Been discussed in other threads, go search it. The stats have been posted before.serious question, do you have numbers that prove that the majority of sex crimes in Europe are committed by 'Asians'?
I think on the other side of it, there are people who have heard enough victim blaming that they don't realize you're trying to be constructive, and that reflex takes over and they freak out. Good class discussions on tough subjects should get people feeling weird though, not a bad thing at all to be uncomfortable in class. I was in a discussion on suicide the other day that got a bit ugly.I would get that but it was a discussion on just the topic in general and what could be done about the problem.
Like, this girl in the class got fucking pissed and was just ranting at me and I was sitting there and like "I get people shouldn't do it, but in the real world, a lot of people are violent fuckfaces and there are steps to limit the risk."
Even the prof was like "we're talking about ways to prevent this... cool your shit"
As I say in every muthafuckin thread about rape by “Asians” in Europe, rape rate in the US is SINGNIFICANTLY higher than any country in Europe (except Sweden whose statistics are completely broken).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics#By_country
So, if you are regularly outraged by stories like this, BUT somehow don’t find yourself getting similarly outraged (on an even more frequent basis) about stories of rape right here in the US...
>>You don’t care about women. You care about outrage porn.<<
I know I will get flamed for this and no one will offer a substantive response.
That’s OK. That’s the way it goes. The price for stating the unpopular truth.
We had one of those and I caught it from the class, probably rightfully so, that people who want to commit suicide cause like some girl dumped them or some shit are pussies.I think on the other side of it, there are people who have heard enough victim blaming that they don't realize you're trying to be constructive, and that reflex takes over and they freak out. Good class discussions on tough subjects should get people feeling weird though, not a bad thing at all to be uncomfortable in class. I was in a discussion on suicide the other day that got a bit ugly.
All lives matter. All rapes matter. All people having healthcare matters. Come at me bro ski.
Tower Hamlets is basically third world level.