- Joined
- Jan 18, 2015
- Messages
- 5,087
- Reaction score
- 1,279
That's not the point though, is it?
Yes it is. You want to give credit to Whittaker for something he didn't do: hurt Romero in the first two rounds. Not only are you assuming something that didn't even happen as if it was a 100% probability, you neglect to give Romero credit for his striking techniques that hurt Whittaker in the first and blame all on "injuries" (something you also have no proof about beyond Whittakers words, even then he conceded that it wasn't a big deal going into the fight and that Romero jacked it up in the first).