Man wins 9 million dollars from wife's lover after finding him in bed with his wife

Manlets.
When will they learn?
 
She should be paying. This is just pathetic though.

I'd go without pussy forever before I'd put up with anyone treating me like this.
 
You seem to be in the right place as the resident incel womanlet.

<{outtahere}>
Lol on another website I was making misandrist rants and this guy came in and said, “what is this, a female incel?” Lmao I died laughing.
 


Claims his marriage was in perfect shape before stranger came along and "stole" his wife away. This is the fate of all those who are provider males (men under 6'0). For your information, this scenario, follow typical pattern shown in a past marriage study. Men who are considered not tall (less than 6'0) often got married later in life (30's) to younger women and said to use their higher earning power to control the relationship.

As such marriage for them tend to last longer as women after a certain age seek providers and if he is best earning power willing to commit to her then she will remain loyal. However, I'm betting what happens in many of these relationship there is very little sexual compatibility as the woman main attraction towards said person is the things provided for her and not the person in particularly.So eventually, she gets dick on the side from men she does find attractive. So while marriage for men under 6'0 appears on outside good, I'm guessing a lot of down low cucking is happening.

On the other other hand men over 6'0 got to marry women their age range and women were perfectly fine dating men who make less than them. e.g. fireman making 50k a year dating a lawyer making 150k a year. However, marriage for said relationship had higher chance of divorces than men who were shorter and married later in life. At least for these men there is a lower chance of cheating as the wife in question decision to marry said person was not purely base on ability to provide but actual sexual attraction towards her husband.

So it's a double edge sword as a man as we can see here.


I feel a little sad that you spent a lot of time putting together something so stupid and mediocre.
 
Thread was done weeks ago.
 


Claims his marriage was in perfect shape before stranger came along and "stole" his wife away. This is the fate of all those who are provider males (men under 6'0). For your information, this scenario, follow typical pattern shown in a past marriage study. Men who are considered not tall (less than 6'0) often got married later in life (30's) to younger women and said to use their higher earning power to control the relationship.

As such marriage for them tend to last longer as women after a certain age seek providers and if he is best earning power willing to commit to her then she will remain loyal. However, I'm betting what happens in many of these relationship there is very little sexual compatibility as the woman main attraction towards said person is the things provided for her and not the person in particularly.So eventually, she gets dick on the side from men she does find attractive. So while marriage for men under 6'0 appears on outside good, I'm guessing a lot of down low cucking is happening.

On the other other hand men over 6'0 got to marry women their age range and women were perfectly fine dating men who make less than them. e.g. fireman making 50k a year dating a lawyer making 150k a year. However, marriage for said relationship had higher chance of divorces than men who were shorter and married later in life. At least for these men there is a lower chance of cheating as the wife in question decision to marry said person was not purely base on ability to provide but actual sexual attraction towards her husband.

So it's a double edge sword as a man as we can see here.

How did you get all that shit you posted from the video?
 
LoL at a man using the word "lover" in any capacity for any reason whatsoever.
I see your point, but what if the word "lover" is between the words "meat" and "pizza"?
There's gotta be an exception for that.
 
You guys come up with some of the dumbest theories for why you don't get laid. The insecurity is a bad look and is the #1 reason why you aren't getting laid. Being under 6' has very little to do with it.
 
How did you get all that shit you posted from the video?

There was actually a study done in marriage pattern between men who are short and those who are tall, which i explain in the opening. The remainder of it just extrapolatess from this and the scenario seen above.
 
For those interested in the study

Sociologists from NYU combed through data using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) — which has collected information on the same 4,500 families since 1968.

For the study, researchers analyzed data from 1986 — the first year height was recorded — through 2011 to determine if a man’s height affected relationship dynamics. Men were classified as short (less than 66” in 1986; less than 67” in 2009), average, or tall (more than 73” in 1986; more than 74” in 2009).

Researchers also measured income, education and the height difference between spouses once the men were actually married. For example, in 1986, 92.7 percent of men were taller than their spouses; in 2009, 92.2 percent were taller.

From the data, researchers found major differences in relationship patterns between short and tall men.

Love lives of short men:

Short men were found to marry later in life than average or tall men, but were 32 percent less likely to divorce. They were also more likely to marry less educated and younger women. Once married, they did less of the housework and earned a much higher income than their spouse.

Why? The researchers hypothesize that because height is related to masculinity, short men may use other aspects of the relationship — income, housework — to demonstrate their manliness. “Short men may exchange their breadwinner status for less housework ... because a lower share of housework or a higher share of relative earnings allow short men to enact traditional gender ideals, thereby performing their masculinity in the absence of symbolic anthropomorphic differences,” the researchers write in the paper.

Love lives of tall men:

Tall men were found to marry sooner in life, but were more at risk for divorce later on, as shorter men had more stable marriages. However, researchers note that the link between short men and stable marriages could be because they chose to marry later (or didn’t have the option until later).


Tall men were also more likely to marry women closer to their age, and who were better-educated.

Why? “From the perspective of relationship exchange models, this indicates that the tallest men exchange their attractive attribute (height) for better-educated spouses, while short men are unable to do so,” the researchers write.

It should be noted that this data suggests a trend which occurred from 1986 to 2011, and of course does not apply to all couples. However, it does shed light on an interesting topic.

As the researchers explain in the paper, “Marriage and divorce have implications for socioeconomic stratification and asset accumulation, our observed effects suggest that men’s height may indirectly affect their economic status and socioeconomic mobility through these demographic processes.”
 
There is even a tinder study on behavior of which men get most of the attention on there and it was found stereotypically to be tall, good looking men got most of the sex. Thus, again validating that when it comes to sexual attraction most men cannot cut it for women.Compound this furhter with the okcupid study in which women rated 80% of men (taken from random sample off facebook/ok cupid database) below average in looks points to reason that a lot of women are with guys not because they are physically attracted to them.
 
For those interested in the study

Sociologists from NYU combed through data using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) — which has collected information on the same 4,500 families since 1968.

For the study, researchers analyzed data from 1986 — the first year height was recorded — through 2011 to determine if a man’s height affected relationship dynamics. Men were classified as short (less than 66” in 1986; less than 67” in 2009), average, or tall (more than 73” in 1986; more than 74” in 2009).

Researchers also measured income, education and the height difference between spouses once the men were actually married. For example, in 1986, 92.7 percent of men were taller than their spouses; in 2009, 92.2 percent were taller.

From the data, researchers found major differences in relationship patterns between short and tall men.

Love lives of short men:

Short men were found to marry later in life than average or tall men, but were 32 percent less likely to divorce. They were also more likely to marry less educated and younger women. Once married, they did less of the housework and earned a much higher income than their spouse.

Why? The researchers hypothesize that because height is related to masculinity, short men may use other aspects of the relationship — income, housework — to demonstrate their manliness. “Short men may exchange their breadwinner status for less housework ... because a lower share of housework or a higher share of relative earnings allow short men to enact traditional gender ideals, thereby performing their masculinity in the absence of symbolic anthropomorphic differences,” the researchers write in the paper.

Love lives of tall men:

Tall men were found to marry sooner in life, but were more at risk for divorce later on, as shorter men had more stable marriages. However, researchers note that the link between short men and stable marriages could be because they chose to marry later (or didn’t have the option until later).


Tall men were also more likely to marry women closer to their age, and who were better-educated.

Why? “From the perspective of relationship exchange models, this indicates that the tallest men exchange their attractive attribute (height) for better-educated spouses, while short men are unable to do so,” the researchers write.

It should be noted that this data suggests a trend which occurred from 1986 to 2011, and of course does not apply to all couples. However, it does shed light on an interesting topic.

As the researchers explain in the paper, “Marriage and divorce have implications for socioeconomic stratification and asset accumulation, our observed effects suggest that men’s height may indirectly affect their economic status and socioeconomic mobility through these demographic processes.”
So shorter men are choosing to marry later in life (after being financially stable?)
-They're getting younger (probably hotter) broads to marry them
-They're having those broads know their place during the marriage
-Their wives are less likely to divorce them, cutting them in financially

I'm not sure the manlets are losing in life, according to that study
 
So shorter men are choosing to marry later in life (after being financially stable?)
-They're getting younger (probably hotter) broads to marry them
-They're having those broads know their place during the marriage
-Their wives are less likely to divorce them, cutting them in financially

I'm not sure the manlets are losing in life, according to that study

-Short men are getting married later in life to younger women. However, the study also says that they have to offset their lack of height by making more money than their spouse and have better education. Essentially having to play with the provider role to attract the female into wanting to be with him. However, as you pointed out that the man in question uses this to his advantage to keep the female in place in marriage. However, this does not mean that the wife is sexually attracted to the male physically and as can be seen in the opening video for an example could easily be getting dicked on the side by a man she truly finds attractive while said male continues to provide a nice life for her. So in short, yes you get a young pretty wife that you can lay down the law towards but that does not mean that her primary motive of being with you isn't for security.
 
Back
Top