- Joined
- May 12, 2016
- Messages
- 13,907
- Reaction score
- 10,810
A dangerous lie? There's a difference between a lie and a mistake. I assumed if Oscar cut all the way down to 145 that it would be at 145. Why lose the extra 2 pounds if he didn't need to?
The narrative is that someone said it wasn't fair for Pacquiao to fight under 140 to face Loma yet Oscar dropped to 145 to fight Pacquiao. Whether the fight was at 145 or 147 is irrelevant because for Oscar it was still more weight to cut than Pacquiao will have to cut to fight Loma even if Pac had to get down to 135. So where is this bias agenda that you're trying to make out?
I said the same thing about Rigo. It made more sense for rigo vs loma to be at 126 than 130. In this case making loma jump up to 140 or over to face pacquiao is unfair. Making the fight at 135 is more reasonable because Pac is very light as it is. I'm sure that weight wouldn't be too difficult for both of them.
Oscar was on his retirement tour when he fought Pac. He had a year long layoff and wanted two or three more fights before calling it a career. He came back and fought at Welterweight (147) against Steve Forbes angling for an extremely lucrative rematch with Floyd. Floyd retired, killing his plan, but Pac was willing to move up from Lightweight to fight him at Welterweight. Prior to Oscar coming back as a Welterweight, he was fighting at Junior Middleweight (154). Prior to that he was fighting at Middleweight. Why lose an extra couple pounds if Oscar didn't need to? To come in lighter against arguably the fastest fighter in the sport at the time in Pac.
Roach said no to 135 for Pac so if this fight does ever happen then it'd have to be at 138 or 140. Pac would risk draining himself to make 135 and he's the A-side. It wouldn't make sense.
Last edited: