Michael Cohen, personal attorney to Donald Trump, officially under criminal investigation

[cincymma79]

Thread is about Trump... but but but Clinton
Thread is about Michael Cohen... but but but Clinton

Please donate your brain to science after you die. Science can learn from people like you.

If a specific claim is made I will rebut it. I have made no claim about Cohen yet, but I will go so far as to say this will likely not be it

 

[Quipling]

You can go back to the election with this pretty easily. You are a liar. I’m also old enough to have lived through a lot of this since I served under bill.

There's a search tool that shows you're lying. That's why you're a bad liar.

You're just out of arguments. Happens to stupid people

Ah, yes, I'm the stupid person who is out of arguments. Not you. Obviously.

 

[cincymma79]

There's a search tool that shows you're lying. That's why you're a bad liar.






Ah, yes, I'm the stupid person who is out of arguments. Not you. Obviously.

You can go back to when hillary was announced. I was opposed to her for this and of course the fact I don’t want any more bush, Clinton or Kennedy—- Also why I wouldn’t vote for Michelle obama.

 

[cincymma79]

There's a search tool that shows you're lying. That's why you're a bad liar.






Ah, yes, I'm the stupid person who is out of arguments. Not you. Obviously.

Also when we brought up this stuff during Clinton’s presidency we were told it didn’t matter. We lost that debate so imagine our surprise when now that same argument is being used by the Same people who told us it didn’t matter

 

[Quipling]

You can go back to when hillary was announced. I was opposed to her for this and of course the fact I don’t want any more bush, Clinton or Kennedy—- Also why I wouldn’t vote for Michelle obama.

Also when we brought up this stuff during Clinton’s presidency we were told it didn’t matter. We lost that debate so imagine our surprise when now that same argument is being used by the Same people who told us it didn’t matter

You realize that Hillary announced her candidacy in 2015, and it is painfully obvious from searching your posts thst you first started discussing this in November 2017?

This is why I called you a bad liar. You are lying despite those lies being easy to check.

But I've entertained your stupid detour long enough (nobody gives a shit that, in 2018, you don't plan to vote for bush), so let's wrap back to the topic of this thread: Michael Cohen.

 

[JosephDredd]

Also when we brought up this stuff during Clinton’s presidency we were told it didn’t matter. We lost that debate so imagine our surprise when now that same argument is being used by the Same people who told us it didn’t matter

What are your talking about? No one is saying Trump should be investigated for banging a porn star and, during Clinton's time, Monica was not paid hush money by a dirty attorney from who seems to have either used campaign funds or an LLC that was a slush fund for foreign oligarchs while he was peddling influence.

You're talking shit.

 

[cincymma79]

You realize that Hillary announced her candidacy in 2015, and it is painfully obvious from searching your posts thst you first started discussing this in November 2017?

This is why I called you a bad liar. You are lying despite those lies being easy to check.

But I've entertained your stupid detour ling enough (nobody gives a shit that, in 2018, you don't plan to vote for bush), so let's wrap back to the topic of this thread: Michael Cohen.

You search is purposefully cut. I was opposed to her for her attacking the women all the way back then. Now some of you have amnesia so I’ve had to fill in the details when asked about who these women are and remind you people of your behavior at the time because you’re all saying thisnever happened. So yes if you’re hyper specific about those parts you won’t find them. But you could easily go to 2016 and find anti hillary stuff from me. You might even be able to find stuff around the Benghazi era of me saying Benghazi didn’t likely involve her but saying this kind of stuff about her. In fact I think I recall posting videos of obama slamming her


Michael Cohen will not be it
But he does appear to suck

 

[cincymma79]

What are your talking about? No one is saying Trump should be investigated for banging a porn star and, during Clinton's time, Monica was not paid hush money by a dirty attorney from who seems to have either used campaign funds or an LLC that was a slush fund for foreign oligarchs while he was peddling influence.

You're talking shit.

That isn’t what I was responding to. You’re talking shit

Also after like 500 oligarchs you ah r to start to wonder if your definition of oligarch might be suspect

 

[JadeOwl]

Rape. Fucking rape. As in bloodied one girls lip. So either we believe the women or we don’t. You can’t apply it where you feel like it

If there ever had been a single iota of legitimate evidence that Bill Clinton ever raped anyone, the Republicans would've tried to have him prosecuted or criminally investigated for it decades ago.

I've no doubt that Bill Clinton is, as my mother euphemistically calls it, "pipilectic". But I don't believe he ever needed to resort to anything other than his silver tongue to get into a woman's pants.

 

[cincymma79]

If there ever had been a single iota of legitimate evidence that Bill Clinton ever raped anyone, the Republicans would've tried to have him prosecuted or criminally investigated for it decades ago.

I've no doubt that Bill Clinton is, as my mother euphemistically calls it, "pipilectic". But I don't believe he ever needed to resort to anything other than his silver tongue to get into a woman's pants.

Is there a flowchart for when we believe the women

 

[Quipling]

You search is purposefully cut. . .

Literally anyone can enter the keywords displayed in those searches and see that you are lying.

But you could easily go to 2016 and find anti hillary stuff from me

Yeah. In the spirit cooking thread on the day of the election. Amazing stuff.
http://forums.sherdog.com/search/123075347/?page=6&q=Hillary&o=date&c[user][0]=447585

Youmight even be able to find stuff around the Benghazi era of me saying Benghazi didn’t likely involve her but saying this kind of stuff about her.

The Benghazi attack was in 2012. You didn't have an account then. You didn't mention it until 2017.

http://forums.sherdog.com/search/123076319/?q=Benghazi&o=date&c[user][0]=447585

How are you so bad at this?

And what does any of this have to do with Cohen's criminal case?

 

[zebby23]

So is Michael Cohen taking payments in order to get access to Trump considered Pay for play? Let me know when the lock him up chants should start. O wait, Dems and intelligent people don't behave like that

 

[JosephDredd]

That isn’t what I was responding to. You’re talking shit

Also after like 500 oligarchs you ah r to start to wonder if your definition of oligarch might be suspect

In what way does Michael Cohen relate to Clinton?

Your consumption of knowledge is suspect.

 

[zebby23]

If there ever had been a single iota of legitimate evidence that Bill Clinton ever raped anyone, the Republicans would've tried to have him prosecuted or criminally investigated for it decades ago.

I've no doubt that Bill Clinton is, as my mother euphemistically calls it, "pipilectic". But I don't believe he ever needed to resort to anything other than his silver tongue to get into a woman's pants.

But Brietbart or Infowars said it and it sounded good to @cincymma79 so why get actual facts involved?

 

[zebby23]

 

[cincymma79]

Literally anyone can enter the keywords displayed in those searches and see that you are lying.

Yeah. In the spirit cooking thread on the day of the election. Amazing stuff.
http://forums.sherdog.com/search/123075347/?page=6&q=Hillary&o=date&c[user][0]=447585



The Benghazi attack was in 2012. You didn't have an account then. You didn't mention it until 2017.

http://forums.sherdog.com/search/123076319/?q=Benghazi&o=date&c[user][0]=447585

How are you so bad at this?

And what does any of this have to do with Cohen's criminal case?

I wasn’t responding to that. I have responded to it though.

 

[zebby23]

I wasn’t responding to that. I have responded to it though.

Donald Trump is his blowhard voice. PAAAAAAAY FOR PLAAAAAAAAY

 

[cincymma79]

But Brietbart or Infowars said it and it sounded good to @cincymma79 so why get actual facts involved?

This was reported long before bitching about breitbart was a twinkle in your eyes

 

[JosephDredd]

Yeah. In the spirit cooking thread on the day of the election. Amazing stuff.
http://forums.sherdog.com/search/123075347/?page=6&q=Hillary&o=date&c[user][0]=447585

@SBJJ you were asking about conspiracy theories...?

Also, did I tag you correctly in the Bill Clinton perspective thread? Someone on there was talking Seth Rich bullshit.

 

[JadeOwl]

Is there a flowchart for when we believe the women

It's not hard:

If a woman comes forward with an accusation, you investigate impartially. That is, you always investigate. If her story check out or you find corroborating evidence you proceed. If not, close the case.

In Bill Clinton's case, the dude was put under a microscope for a decade by people highly motivated to find anything they could use to prosecute him and were willing to act in bad faith to do it. If that kind of scrutiny failed to come up with anything to pin on him on that department, then I feel pretty confident assuming that Clinton never raped anyone.

The point about believing women when they come forward with rape allegation is that they should never be dismissed out of hand and should always be properly investigated. And all the allegations against Bill Clinton have been investigated ad nauseam, by people with a vested interest in finding fault in him.