Middle-class income rose above $61,000 for the first time last year, U.S. Census Bureau says

Son of Jamin

Make MMA Great Again
@Silver
Joined
Jul 21, 2007
Messages
11,868
Reaction score
875
FPKY4PFFO4I6RLLPBADXBXG5YI.jpg

Middle-class income rose to the highest recorded levels in 2017 and the national poverty rate declined as the benefits of the strong economy lifted the fortunes of more Americans, the U.S. Census reported Wednesday.

The median U.S. household earned $61,372 last year, meaning half of the families in the country brought in more income than this and half earned less.

Crossing the $61,000 mark signals the American middle-class may have finally earned more than it did in 1999, although the Census Bureau cautions that median income last year was not statistically different from 1999 or 2007, the last year before the recession. A change in methodology in 2013 makes precise comparisons difficult. All the income figures have been adjusted for inflation and are reported in 2017 dollars.

Middle-class household income has been rising steadily for the past several years as the economy has rebounded from the deep recession and millions of Americans have found jobs again. The extra pay from having another person in the home employed again or working additional hours is the largest factor contributing to rising income, the Census Bureau said.

[For first time since 2010, America’s progress on health insurance stalls]

"We’re continuing to see a shift from part-time to full-time work, so some of that could explain an increase in income,” said Trudi Renwick, an assistant division chief at Census Bureau.

The Census Bureau also reported that the U.S. poverty rate declined modestly to 12.3 percent, the lowest level in more than a decade and a sign the economic devastation from the Great Recession is subsiding.

But by other measures, the economy is still not working as well as it could for everyone. Inequality remains near the highest levels in the modern era, according to various metrics the Census Bureau tracks, and the share of Americans without health insurance stalled last year after several years of progress to extend coverage to more people under the Affordable Care Act.

Y64GCE53KZCJPBK3JR6SOBOXMQ.jpg


The percentage of Americans without health insurance was essentially unchanged from 2016 to 2017 — staying at about 8.8 percent, or 28.5 million people — despite the overall economic boom. That marks a leveling off in the decline in the number of Americans without insurance — a number that trended steadily downward from 2010 to 2016, in part due to the implementation of the Affordable Care Act.

What it will take for more Americans to get ahead is higher hourly wages, said Jared Bernstein, former chief economist to vice president Joe Biden and a senior fellow at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Much of the income growth in recent years is from people getting jobs again, but economists across the political spectrum agree that wage growth has been disappointing and that the working class would likely be doing even better if pay and productivity would rise.

“Income growth was dominated by putting people back to work after the Great Recession and not wage growth," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, head of the right-leaning American Action Forum and a former economic adviser to GOP presidential candidates.

Incomes for full-time male and female workers declined slightly last year, the Census Bureau found, a reminder that wage gains have been sluggish and mostly wiped out by rising prices for gas, rent and other necessities.

Holtz-Eakin added that the latest Census Bureau income data is for 2017, before President Trump and GOP leaders in Congress passed tax cuts and scaled back regulations on businesses in an effort to boost economic growth, productivity and wages.

Democrats counter that the tax cuts are mainly helping the wealthiest Americans, and that the GOP wants to do additional tax cuts and scale back the safety net at a time when inequality remains high and many working poor are still struggling.

Last year, 39.7 million Americans were living in poverty, a number that did not decline much from 2016. While the poverty rate is now at the lowest level since 2006, it is still a full percentage point above the rate in 2000, the last time unemployment was this low.

“That surprises me. I was expecting better improvement with the economy,” said H. Luke Shaefer, of the University of Michigan. “It’s something experts and policymakers should take a look at.”

The poverty rates for African-Americans and Hispanics also remain substantially higher than for whites and Asians although the unemployment rates for African-Americans and Hispanics have come down swiftly. Twenty-two percent of African-American households and 19.4 percent of Hispanic households live in poverty compared to 11 percent for whites and 10.1 percent for Asian-Americans, the Census Bureau reported.

“It’s not that growth is failing to reach the middle and low-income entirely. It’s just that there is so much inequality that these folks aren’t getting ahead as quickly as they should,” said Bernstein.

Economists have been worried about why wage growth has been so sluggish lately, but Americans are compensating for that by working longer hours or having another family member find employment. Job openings hit a record high in July, the Labor Department reported this week, and there are now more jobs available than unemployed workers.

Median household income is generally viewed as the best gauge of how a typical middle-class home is faring financially, although households can vary in size from a single person to multiple adults and children residing under the same roof. The average U.S. household has 2.6 people.

Clarification: This story has been updated to make clear that although household median income of $61,372 is the highest ever recorded by the Census Bureau, officials caution the figure is not to be treated as statistically different from previous highs reached in 2007 and 1999. Precise comparisons aren't possible due to a change in methodology in 2013.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...us-says/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.0fb52018f746
Some positive news for a change!
 
A lot of the current boom is fueled by debt, which is going to bite the economy in the ass down the road.

US household debt has set yet another record high. In the first quarter of 2018, it reached $13.2 trillion, a $63 billion increase from the previous quarter. Now, household debt is half a trillion dollars higher than its previous peak in 2008, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which uses data from Equifax.

https://qz.com/1280927/us-household-debt-has-hit-an-all-time-high-of-13-2-trillion/
 
A lot of the current boom is fueled by debt, which is going to bite the economy in the ass down the road.



https://qz.com/1280927/us-household-debt-has-hit-an-all-time-high-of-13-2-trillion/

I'm not sure this is accurate. That is, I don't think the current "boom" is even all that related to the incurred debt, at least not to an extent any different than past growth. I think it would happen regardless of having exploded the deficit. But that's probably even worse as far as justifications for the tax cuts, as it just accentuates how reckless and useless they were.
 
Key juicy details
Crossing the $61,000 mark signals the American middle-class may have finally earned more than it did in 1999, although the Census Bureau cautions that median income last year was not statistically different from 1999 or 2007, the last year before the recession. A change in methodology in 2013 makes precise comparisons difficult. All the income figures have been adjusted for inflation and are reported in 2017 dollars.

But by other measures, the economy is still not working as well as it could for everyone. Inequality remains near the highest levels in the modern era, according to various metrics the Census Bureau tracks, and the share of Americans without health insurance stalled last year after several years of progress to extend coverage to more people under the Affordable Care Act.

The percentage of Americans without health insurance was essentially unchanged from 2016 to 2017 — staying at about 8.8 percent, or 28.5 million people — despite the overall economic boom. That marks a leveling off in the decline in the number of Americans without insurance — a number that trended steadily downward from 2010 to 2016, in part due to the implementation of the Affordable Care Act.

What it will take for more Americans to get ahead is higher hourly wages, said Jared Bernstein, former chief economist to vice president Joe Biden and a senior fellow at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Much of the income growth in recent years is from people getting jobs again, but economists across the political spectrum agree that wage growth has been disappointing and that the working class would likely be doing even better if pay and productivity would rise.

“Income growth was dominated by putting people back to work after the Great Recession and not wage growth," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, head of the right-leaning American Action Forum and a former economic adviser to GOP presidential candidates.

Incomes for full-time male and female workers declined slightly last year, the Census Bureau found, a reminder that wage gains have been sluggish and mostly wiped out by rising prices for gas, rent and other necessities.

Holtz-Eakin added that the latest Census Bureau income data is for 2017, before President Trump and GOP leaders in Congress passed tax cuts and scaled back regulations on businesses in an effort to boost economic growth, productivity and wages.

Democrats counter that the tax cuts are mainly helping the wealthiest Americans, and that the GOP wants to do additional tax cuts and scale back the safety net at a time when inequality remains high and many working poor are still struggling.

Last year, 39.7 million Americans were living in poverty, a number that did not decline much from 2016. While the poverty rate is now at the lowest level since 2006, it is still a full percentage point above the rate in 2000, the last time unemployment was this low.

“That surprises me. I was expecting better improvement with the economy,” said H. Luke Shaefer, of the University of Michigan. “It’s something experts and policymakers should take a look at.”

The poverty rates for African-Americans and Hispanics also remain substantially higher than for whites and Asians although the unemployment rates for African-Americans and Hispanics have come down swiftly. Twenty-two percent of African-American households and 19.4 percent of Hispanic households live in poverty compared to 11 percent for whites and 10.1 percent for Asian-Americans, the Census Bureau reported.

“It’s not that growth is failing to reach the middle and low-income entirely. It’s just that there is so much inequality that these folks aren’t getting ahead as quickly as they should,” said Bernstein.

Economists have been worried about why wage growth has been so sluggish lately, but Americans are compensating for that by working longer hours or having another family member find employment. Job openings hit a record high in July, the Labor Department reported this week, and there are now more jobs available than unemployed workers.

Also, this doesn't take into account that literally everything we buy has outgrown the same inflation standards meaning our $61k doesn't go as far as the $60k in 1999. Not to mention we have to work longer hours to achieve these goals, so the middle class is still getting doubly fucked.
 
Don't know if I'd call it that good of news to be honest. Did you read the article?

It definitely seems like there are more jobs available, but wages declining, uninsured remaining stagnant, poverty rate 1% higher since last time the US had the same low unemployment rate, wealth inequality rising (which means a shift in political power). Not exactly great news across the board.

Key juicy details


Also, this doesn't take into account that literally everything we buy has outgrown the same inflation standards meaning our $61k doesn't go as far as the $60k in 1999. Not to mention we have to work longer hours to achieve these goals, so the middle class is still getting doubly fucked.
This is a legit concern too. Especially with premiums being as high as they are, it's no wonder more people are not getting insured despite unemployment going down.
 
Last edited:
Not impressive.....this shit pay would be garbage in the 1950s.
 
If we all just went into debt and decided not to pay, then we'd all be multimillionaires like Bernie wants us to be!!

#feeltehburn
We could be multi-billionaires when hyperinflation arrives.
 
Don't know if I'd call it that good of news to be honest. Did you read the article?

It definitely seems like there are more jobs available, but wages declining, uninsured remaining stagnant, poverty rate 1% higher since last time the US had the same low unemployment rate, wealth inequality rising (which means a shift in political power). Not exactly great news across the board.

This is a legit concern too. Especially with premiums being as high as they are, it's not wonder more people are not getting insured despite unemployment going down.
What I took from it mainly was that unemployment was down, even so for minorities. Which in turn can empower their lives.
 
What I took from it mainly was that unemployment was down, even so for minorities. Which in turn can empower their lives.
But can it? There are also plenty of lower middle class white people struggling as well.

Both low-income parents are forced to work 60 hours/week and have zero time or energy for their children- then we wonder why the endless cycle continues. Invest in our future by investing in the present.
 
What I took from it mainly was that unemployment was down, even so for minorities. Which in turn can empower their lives.
I think that's unfortunately a very reductionist way of looking at the issues.

30 million uninsured, wages declining, debt increasing (personal debt higher than before the crash in 2008), wealth inequality rising, poverty rates stagnant. Yes GDP is going well, but we know who gets that cream and it's definitely not the working class, and unemployment is low, but people are still struggling.
 
FPKY4PFFO4I6RLLPBADXBXG5YI.jpg


Some positive news for a change!

Why are they reporting median growth, instead of the growth of the average Americans wealth, or wages?

Is it because when you count median wealth, it allows for Jeff bezos becoming 50 billion richer, to be misrepresented and infer I somehow got a piece of that pie?
 
What I took from it mainly was that unemployment was down, even so for minorities. Which in turn can empower their lives.

Unemployment was a better metric when having a job meant having enough to survive.
 
What I took from it mainly was that unemployment was down, even so for minorities. Which in turn can empower their lives.

Maybe if they were given livable wages under proper working conditions.
 
We're spending like we're in a world war when we aren't in any. Sure hope times are good.

Life is always good on credit...until the credit runs out.
 
Thanks drumpf...
That Orange retard pretty much doing the opposite of sound financial policy in times like these is certainly not going to help. But you don't really care about that do you.
 
has purchasing power also gone up? otherwise this is like jerking yourself off with your left hand.
 
Back
Top