I didn't think Canelo vs Khan was a joke though. I liked that fight and honestly, I don't mind this one either. You're deliberately misreading my comment there and you know it.
Then you lack reading comprehension skills. As I pointed out, I liked Khan vs Canelo. My comments obviously weren't based on my opinion, they were a call out of everyone who criticized Khan and canelo who then pretend that Brook/Golovkin is some great superfight and not a mismatch at all.
See, this is what I'm saying, you're circling the actual issue. How does the fact that Canelo fought Khan instead of Golovkin somehow make Brook less of an underdog against Golovkin? How does it improve the quality of the match up? That is seriously the worst argument I can think of to legitimize one of those fights while shitting on the other.
"Hey, isn't Brook vs Golovkin sort of a mismatch?"
"Well no, stupid! Because Canelo fought Khan instead of Golovkin that time!"