- Joined
- Nov 9, 2016
- Messages
- 30,580
- Reaction score
- 6,014
Never said he was a weak striker.MJ is a weak striker now?
He is faster and stronger than Conor just lacks the range and accuracy compared to Conor.
just that Nate was facing a far weaker striker than he was against Conor. Naturally he will look good, as he's the far superior boxer. Doesn't necessarily mean that was the best version of him relative to his bouts with Conor. Technically, I feel Nate was clearly at his absolute best against Conor and why wouldn't he be. Those were the biggest fights of his career / life.
MJ's got some hands but I wouldn't put his boxing / striking In the same universe as Conor. Not trying to gargle nuts or anything but It's the truth.