- Joined
- Oct 18, 2012
- Messages
- 346
- Reaction score
- 0
One big notable difference I've found from being a completely defensive fighter in boxing (philly shelling/shoulder rolling countering), is that this sort of ideal is hard to use in MT. You can absolutely counterstrike, but being a dedicated counter striker is almost impossible (ESPECIALLY WITH BAD HANDS). A lot of the really good counter strikers I've seen in K1/MT have really really good hands.
In boxing you can sort of wait around, roll, counter-2, move out. In MT I've found that I need to bait, counter, unload 3 or 4 shots, move out or clinch up and then if you've moved out, you'll probably have to check a returning kick or teep them back, or if you've clinched up it's time to start working them.
Also, the problem with wanting to counterstrike is that generally counterstriker's are on the lookout for 1 or 2 big shots or a few good combos. This generally messes with the idea that you should just teep or jab them away... Seeing as you want to make the shots count. Why not catch them with a jab on the way in, then rip the front leg as they put the weight on it instead of just jabbing and moving out ?
I just think that you can be relatively (NOTE: RELATIVELY) more inactive as a counter-boxer rather than a counter-kickboxer, simply because of that fact that if you clinch, you have to work, and if you move out, you have to work...
In boxing you can sort of wait around, roll, counter-2, move out. In MT I've found that I need to bait, counter, unload 3 or 4 shots, move out or clinch up and then if you've moved out, you'll probably have to check a returning kick or teep them back, or if you've clinched up it's time to start working them.
Also, the problem with wanting to counterstrike is that generally counterstriker's are on the lookout for 1 or 2 big shots or a few good combos. This generally messes with the idea that you should just teep or jab them away... Seeing as you want to make the shots count. Why not catch them with a jab on the way in, then rip the front leg as they put the weight on it instead of just jabbing and moving out ?
I just think that you can be relatively (NOTE: RELATIVELY) more inactive as a counter-boxer rather than a counter-kickboxer, simply because of that fact that if you clinch, you have to work, and if you move out, you have to work...