I can understand where
@shinkyoku is coming from.
I don’t think there is an issue if you want to teach kids karate classes but it would require you having to put considerable time to reach at least a black belt level.
If you put time in and reach green belt (like in your example) - you’re cup is half full - you’ll only know about half of the syllabus (of most Karate styles).
The question is whether that’s acceptable to you (and if it is I'd say you interest in Karate is superficial). Would you be ok with teaching MT if you only had half of the techniques/syllabus down and would you more importantly be able to teach to a high standard or do you think it might be a disservice to those you’re teaching? You have to remember that even though MT and Karate share similarities they are also completely different martial arts with different syllabuses & techniques.
There’s also the question of whether you’d be able to adequately teach the techniques in Karate that aren’t shared with MT like the katas/forms, open hand blocks/strikes, stances, some kicking techniques etc even if you had a green belt. You might be perfectly fine with the techniques that cross over as you can rely on your MT experience. But what about things that are completely new - like all the intricacies of the stances, stance transitioning, the open hand strikes/blocks, kata/forms etc - you’ll only have a green belts level of experience to rely on and if I’m being honest that's not enough.
I think your decision shouldn't be motivated by monetary value (that's what it looks like otherwise you'd just put the time in) - but by how well you'll be able to teach Karate to kids. At orange or green belt - imho you just simply don't have enough experience/knowledge of the system to teach effectively. Sure you could teach - but would you be teaching Karate well? Most likely not. You have to decide if that's acceptable to you. Plus I think if you teach Karate with your cup half full - it's a disservice to the art and a disservice to the effort/sacrifices karateka have made to get the art where it is today.
I'd say to teach any sort of Karate competently you'd need training to at least brown belt at a minimum - black belt ideally. That's about 3 to 5 years of consistent training.
this is the most level headed post on this thread so far. I see your points and agree with many of them.
- I think your decision shouldn't be motivated by monetary value (that's what it looks like otherwise you'd just put the time in)
The thing is im 35 years old, I simply do not have the time to pursue a black belt everyone needs to undestand this, as its a major point in my argument. 5 yrs of consistant training, 10 year of part time training to get a black belt. This is something that may be difficult for the younger members to understand. as we get older, we get more and more responsibilites, less and less free time, and life pretty much just becomes work.
I also agree with your "cup half full" statement. but theres another point to my argument that it seems many people are missing. The plan is to only teach the
very basics of karate, there is no plan to advance the kids past my belt level. When they reach my belt level, they will transition into MT. I am not going to earn a "orange" belt, and start pumping out black belts. Your cup half full statement would be alot more valid if I was planning on taking the kids anywhere beyond basic
a way to look at it would be this. You have MT coach who had a few pro fights in the US. He coaches his guys to his level, once they have reached that level, he sends them out to thailand for training to get to a level beyond his.
So it would be the same with Karate, teach them the very basics, as much as I know and have learned, get them up to my belt level, and then transition them into MT, the more effective martial art.
-imho you just simply don't have enough experience/knowledge of the system to teach effectively.
IMO opinion a orange belt is qualified to teach the basics to 5 yr olds. Just as a guy who has trained MT but never fought can teach the basics of MT to a 5 yr old. Can he teach the basics effectively? yes. Can he create a lumpinee champ/black belt.......no. but the plan/goal is to only teach basics, not create black belts/champs.
When you see 5 yr old black belts, you cant help but think a 35 yr old man wouldnt have much of a problem of getting a black belt.
The entire reason i asked this question was to see what I would have to learn, how long it would take me, and if my MT could help speed the process up. Sure I can watch a kyokushin video and copy those style of kicks, but theres more to it, like katas n all that shit, stuff I dont know and was asking her on the forum to learn about instead of what this thread has turned into.
Lastly my interest in karate is not superficial. I see many good things in it, specifically kyokushin, and have tried to incorporate that stuff into my training. I have done jumping kicks in my fights because of this.