- Joined
- Jan 20, 2007
- Messages
- 31,985
- Reaction score
- 11,765
Nothing to concede. It's cut and dry. But continually saying a poster is upset(it's obvious he's not) just because another poster said it once is pretty much derailing.
Mueller told Trump's legal team he will not indict the president, Giuliani tells Fox News
- Thread starter bobgeese
- Start date
Nothing to concede. It's cut and dry. But continually saying a poster is upset(it's obvious he's not) just because another poster said it once is pretty much derailing.
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2007
- Messages
- 50,523
- Reaction score
- 840
Was Rudy wasted on television again. The dude has been having liquid lunch it seems.
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 41,443
- Reaction score
- 0
Interesting read. Thanks.
- Joined
- May 20, 2016
- Messages
- 34,432
- Reaction score
- 15,874
Allow me to quote myself from the OP
“Let the great rustling of 2018 commence”
They’ve literally rustled themselves into a parallel universe. A reality in which they’re waiting for Trump to finish his term, then he will be indicted.
See it all makes sense now.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 52,694
- Reaction score
- 24,708
Sessions was appointed by Trump. All the top Justice Dept. officials are Repubs. I am just pointing out that when Hillary wasn't indicted, the right were saying it was Democrat party bias. So why doesn't the same argument apply if Mueller (allegedly) told Trump's team he would not indict Trump based on Justice Dept. advice.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2017
- Messages
- 39,109
- Reaction score
- 9,764
Allow me to quote myself from the OP
“Let the great rustling of 2018 commence”
They’ve literally rustled themselves into a parallel universe. A reality in which they’re waiting for Trump to finish his term, then he will be indicted.
See it all makes sense now.
Do you have anything to offer, save the peanut gallery "Aw shit, dawg, their panties is twistin!!" shit?
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2017
- Messages
- 37,165
- Reaction score
- 25,335
It's knobgrease you idot
- Joined
- May 27, 2009
- Messages
- 27,523
- Reaction score
- 22,375
That’s disappointing to hear, carry on
Yes, I posted a thread with breaking news. That’s called contributing something worthwhile.
Sherdog used to be great for breaking news. Hopefully it returns to its once illustrious status.
I literally read this like, ok this dudes just having a little fun.
Then I looked down and saw your location.
You probably believe that shit deep down in your heart...
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 6,944
- Reaction score
- 4
How can libs be so concerned with optics and pretend they aren't the real racists?
The very idea of good news or the narrative (words) changing absolutely shatters their world.
The very idea of good news or the narrative (words) changing absolutely shatters their world.
- Joined
- May 25, 2008
- Messages
- 18,464
- Reaction score
- 0
This is it!
But seriously, this is really nothing. First off, it may not even be true, as Rudy is also claiming that Trump has received "assurances" that he is not going to be involved in the Cohen matter, which is a ridiculous thing to claim they have been assured about at this point. As for getting assurances that Mueller will not be looking to indict a sitting president, even if Meuller's team in fact confirmed that, it has nothing to do with the facts in this case any more than it had to do with the facts in Watergate or Lewinskygate. Furthermore, Mueller can still request a special dispensation through DAG Rosenstein to indict Trump if there is strong evidence to do so. But, let's wait for the investigation to play out to see if there is evidence that Trump did anything worthy of being indicted, and it sure doesn't seem like Mueller's investigation, or the Cohen investigation by the SDNY and FBI, are coming to an end anytime soon. We can try to read the goat entrails and project what we want to see all we want, but Mueller's team runs a tight ship, and we just don't know what they know.
But seriously, this is really nothing. First off, it may not even be true, as Rudy is also claiming that Trump has received "assurances" that he is not going to be involved in the Cohen matter, which is a ridiculous thing to claim they have been assured about at this point. As for getting assurances that Mueller will not be looking to indict a sitting president, even if Meuller's team in fact confirmed that, it has nothing to do with the facts in this case any more than it had to do with the facts in Watergate or Lewinskygate. Furthermore, Mueller can still request a special dispensation through DAG Rosenstein to indict Trump if there is strong evidence to do so. But, let's wait for the investigation to play out to see if there is evidence that Trump did anything worthy of being indicted, and it sure doesn't seem like Mueller's investigation, or the Cohen investigation by the SDNY and FBI, are coming to an end anytime soon. We can try to read the goat entrails and project what we want to see all we want, but Mueller's team runs a tight ship, and we just don't know what they know.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2017
- Messages
- 3,778
- Reaction score
- 2,161
Giuliani contradicted himself to WaPo
Lmao
The senility is real
Lmao
The senility is real
