You know, they probably take a quick look at our homicide statistics and reach a similar conclusion... wake me up when Muslims commit 15,000 killings per year in Germany.
You know, they probably take a quick look at our homicide statistics and reach a similar conclusion about our gun laws... wake me up when Muslims commit 15,000 killings per year in Germany.
In fact, you’ve made such a ridiculously shitty comparison, this is for you:
He's not entirely wrong there, it depends on your definition of rape. Basically, like in Christianity, a man has exclusive sexual access to his wife more or less on demand. Consent to marriage is taken as consent to sex so in other words its assumed prior to sexual encounters between husband and wife. Most modern democracies do not view consent within marriage this way.
The idea that the Muslim world is stuck in the 9th century is kind of a shallow, surface level view. Islam did have a reformation, one that was not entirely unlike the Protestant Reformation. Its called the Salafist Reformation. In fact the parallels between the Munster rebellion and the rise of ISIS are striking. Both rebellions were preceded by religious movements which emphasized individual interpretations and spread their message with new communications technology(printing press for Anabaptists, internet for ISIS), successfully attracting recruits from from a wider area than was possible before and both were apocalyptic and ostensibly sought world domination.
I'm sure Israel will see this and change their minds.
Seems pretty non-conclusive especially when the third world has shitty governance with crime reporting. Sweden has crime and rape rates that don't support open borders, and it wasn't good even before the 2015 migrant crisis. Then you have the prison population of UK and France. Strict immigration doesn't mean banning anything unless you object to not wanting to import poverty and freeloaders with nothing to offer (no language skills or skills in general - getting paid below minimum wage for menial jobs is not a skill).
quote what your referencing? You listed crime stats, I replied to that and showed Sweden's crime and rape stats are not favorable to your argument. God knows what would happen if Israel went open borders lol.
Why would you assume that's necessarily going to happen? I'm not saying it can't or won't but at the same time I'm questioning the idea that Islam can and will follow the same path as a fundamentally different religion. Islam is inherently political in a way Christianity isn't. Jesus had the luxury of the Roman state in the background but Prophet Muhammad did not have that same luxury and so you see a part of his career is dedicated to proto-state building such as with his Constitution of Medina whereas Jesus was fortunate enough to be able to rend unto Caesar and not have to deal with that headache.
Yeah I agree he probably doesn't know what he's talking about based on some other things he said and its definitely important to point out the banning of marital rape is a relatively recent phenomenon in the West.
Quote this. I recall replying to someone who strawmanned an argument about fear of guns. I don't know wtf you're talking about.
If you want an immigration policy reflecting a definition, something like what Australia would deem third world and "high risk" countries for overstayers and illegals. Is the definition important? Third world is third world and muslims haven't exactly improved their image with all the terrorism. I'm sure you think all concerns are not justified or are racist though, precisely the thought process which let Rotherham get out of hand.
Nah
