Bigfoot has not been found because there are simply like werewolves and are usually human.
That hoax goes back a thousand years and fooled people before the age of electricity and moving pictures?Bigfoot was a hoax.
- Planet of the Apes was filmed in 1967, the same year the Bigfoot photo was released. Coincidence?
After post production and editing, Planet of the Apes was later released in theaters in 1968.
- Look up images for Ghillie suit
People claiming to have seen Bigfoot recently have a Sniper in their backyard.
There has been full threads on Sherdog about this specific incident but there were plenty of Hollywood special effects artists who not only said the footage was fake, but that they could recreate the costume with a reasonable budge (~$10,000).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patterson–Gimlin_film#Movie_production_companies.27_executives
The person I put the most stock in on this list is Rick Baker, and here's his quote : "it looked like cheap, fake fur." There is this myth surrounding the PG footage that nobody in Hollywood ever believed it could be recreated and that's just 100% pure bullshit. MANY people not only thought it could be recreated but that it wasn't very convincing either.
Not to mention the guys set out to film Bigfoot and then magically they found Bigfoot. Something to remember is that back in those days a camera wasn't something that was very easy to setup... so they just happened to be filming where this Bigfoot decided to walk out of the forest, see them, and then walk back. Not to mention the guy who claims to have made the suit and he gave some startling details as to how it worked. The funny part is the conspiracy people who REFUSE to believe this guy.
Patterson was a shady character, and for someone to get footage on his first expedition raises questions. There are also issues with the other involved persons such as the suit hasn't been produced or any invoices/receipts of the transaction. I would like to see someone with today's technology recreate something similar. There are groups likely to have financial backing to have a costume maker fabricate a suit. National Geographic or other organizations should produce a documentary about making a suit. They have the money to get the best in the business.
Bill Munns, who appears to have much credence in costumes/special effects, argues that it's not a human in the suit. The limb proportions are not found in known humans.
I haven't heard of Rick Baker before, but I would be interested in him analyzing the film in a scientific manner.
People can argue both sides, but until a body is produced, there will be controversy.
There has been full threads on Sherdog about this specific incident but there were plenty of Hollywood special effects artists who not only said the footage was fake, but that they could recreate the costume with a reasonable budge (~$10,000).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patterson–Gimlin_film#Movie_production_companies.27_executives
The person I put the most stock in on this list is Rick Baker, and here's his quote : "it looked like cheap, fake fur." There is this myth surrounding the PG footage that nobody in Hollywood ever believed it could be recreated and that's just 100% pure bullshit. MANY people not only thought it could be recreated but that it wasn't very convincing either.
Not to mention the guys set out to film Bigfoot and then magically they found Bigfoot. Something to remember is that back in those days a camera wasn't something that was very easy to setup... so they just happened to be filming where this Bigfoot decided to walk out of the forest, see them, and then walk back. Not to mention the guy who claims to have made the suit and he gave some startling details as to how it worked. The funny part is the conspiracy people who REFUSE to believe this guy.
Patterson was a shady character, and for someone to get footage on his first expedition raises questions. There are also issues with the other involved persons such as the suit hasn't been produced or any invoices/receipts of the transaction. I would like to see someone with today's technology recreate something similar. There are groups likely to have financial backing to have a costume maker fabricate a suit. National Geographic or other organizations should produce a documentary about making a suit. They have the money to get the best in the business.
Bill Munns, who appears to have much credence in costumes/special effects, argues that it's not a human in the suit. The limb proportions are not found in known humans.
I haven't heard of Rick Baker before, but I would be interested in him analyzing the film in a scientific manner.
People can argue both sides, but until a body is produced, there will be controversy.