Name Someone From "The Other Side" Whom You Admire

Daverisimo

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
4,876
Reaction score
2,172
Before I get into this, I just want to say that I'm not trying to bridge any ideological gaps and get us all singing kumba-fucking-ya. If that's even possible in the WR, I'm not the person to do it, and I'm not interested in doing so at any rate. I'm not trying to get anyone to engage in some Hegelian dialectic. I'm just trying to see if posters in here can look through their own ideological biases for a second.

So, that said, I'd be interested in seeing people:
1) Identify their own ideology as well as they can
2) Identify someone as diametrically opposed to them as possible whom they admire (be it a writer, politician, w/e.)
3) Explain why
4) If possible, recommend something to watch or read.

So, for myself:
1) I'm, by and large, a Socialist, though I tend to be skeptical of both revolutionary Socialism and reform-based approaches. I'm sympathetic to Luxemburgism, for those in the know about these sorts of things, which is to say that I am critical of Leninism, and completely opposed to Stalinism (and similar totalitarian ideologies), but I also think Democratic Socialists are a bunch of pussies.

2) Yukio Mishima
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yukio_Mishima
For the TL;DR version: Post-war Japanese novelist/playwright/actor/director/model/right-wing militia leader. Tried to instigate a coup of the Japanese government. Failed. Committed seppuku.

3) First off, all politics aside, he was just a fantastic writer. The guy could make a three page long description of a cargo ship pulling into port compelling. And beyond that, he wrote such wonderfully complex characters. Even if you hate the protagonist of any of his works, you can at least understand where they're coming from.

As far as the politics go though, there are a few things about his work (and him as a person) that I find appealing. Firstly, I don't know that I've ever read anyone go captures the gut-level appeal of nationalism the way he does. I'm pretty solidly anti-nationalistic, but after reading Runaway Horses, I get it. I don't agree with it, but I do get it. Admittedly, the fact that he was writing about (and for) an extremely ethnically homogeneous audience means that he can go full-scale ultra-nationalism without getting racist, so I'm not immediately repelled (though I'm not under any illusions. If he'd had his way, it probably would've resulted in the expulsion or extermination of any non-ethnic Japanese in Japan, especially Koreans).

Outside of his writing though, I actually have a bit of a begrudging admiration for Mishima himself. Even though I hate his politics, I admire the fact that his actions and beliefs were, generally speaking, incredibly consistent. He didn't just sit on his ass bitching. He had a vision, and he tried to make it a reality, even though he likely realized the futility of it. That sort congruity of belief and action is rare, regardless of the ideology.

4) As far as his political stuff goes, his short story Patriotism is about as good of a bite-sized sample of what I'm talking about that I can imagine
http://www.mutantfrog.com/patriotism-by-yukio-mishima/

As for something more substantial though, I'd recommend the Sea of Fertility quadrilogy.

I'd also recommend Temple of the Golden Pavilion, but it's not really political at all. Just a really good book.
 
I'm a lifelong Republican and I admire John McCain for his service to our country in Vietnam.
 
That's hard for me as I identify my political ideologies as a economic progressive and social libertarian. I'm not even sure if I could identify other historical people that shared this view, nevermind an opposition.
 
That's hard for me as I identify my political ideologies as a economic progressive and social libertarian. I'm not even sure if I could identify other historical people that shared this view, nevermind an opposition.

I guess Eisenhower would be closest to me, so I guess his opposition is the MIC. I can't think of an MIC supporter I have any respect for.
 
I've always liked Dennis Kucinich.

Jimmy Carter was a good guy

I really don't like many politicians at all.
 
Is "no politician or activist" an acceptable answer?
 
Anyone who is a better person than I am. I grew up religious, but religious people have their fair share of layabouts just like most groups. I was raised with the impression that people who gave into vice were inferior. My Dad would pat himself on the back for not smoking or drinking, but he wouldn't look at himself in the mirror and admit that he comes up short in some very important ways.

In the Army I met a guy who is pretty immoral from the simple perspective I've put forward above. Thing is, he worked his ass off. He was in better shape than me, he was a better linguist than me, and he was better at odd jobs than me. Really, I couldn't come up with any meaningful way in which I contributed as much as he did to our squad.

I felt like a moron that it took me so long to realize that. I'm not religious any more, and that won't change in the future; but when I come across somebody who is charitable and hardworking I find him easy to admire and don't particularly care about what he believes in.
 
On a personal, very visceral level, Joseph Stalin. On an ideological level, J. Edgar Hoover.
 
Good at what? I admire Clinton’s slimy ness
 
1) My ideology is simple.

Government should be efficient in how it manages our money. It should spend money in a fashion that maximizes the ROI for those things I consider important to our ability to remain the premier nation in the world. Government has a responsibility to make sure those things that allow it's citizens to most effectively compete on the global stage are developing in the most effective and efficient way possible - this means education, health, military, food, shelter in no particular order.

I am socially liberal, "liberal" in the sense that government should stay out of society's way when it comes to shaping what is/isn't socially acceptable. The less regulation and interference in our private lives the better.

Fiscally, a balanced budget should always be our goal. Not always achievable but it should be an overarching principle for decision making.

2-3) I can't name anyone diametrically opposed to my position because I think elements of it are attractive across the entire population.

4) Read my posts. Seriously though, read everything across all ideological spectrums. Read history - personally, Rome is insightful but so is the era of democratic revolution in Europe and the Americas in the 19th Century. Books on African colonialism and Asian communist regimes. Read religious texts because morality is important, I'm very slowly working through the Bhagavad Gita. They aren't the only source of moral teachings but where they overlap is probably closest to some sense of a universal truth.

Seriously, read everything...even shitty posters.
 
Thatcher, though as a northerner it pains me to say so
 
Im a Bernie/Jill guy but I admire Trump. Come to think of it, 'sides' are not what we imagined them to be, like dem vs repub. It is really corporate big brother establishment politics globalists vs straight shooters that are trying to fight the corruption. The differences between the 'far left' and 'the alt right' are slimmer than their differences between that of the Corey Booker/HRC/Paul Ryan/Mitt Romney types.
 
I think Jimmy Carter is underrated and gets a really bad rap
 
Back
Top