- Joined
- Mar 21, 2016
- Messages
- 2,342
- Reaction score
- 0
It was young and inexperienced pre UFC Silva. Anderson in his prime never lostand yet, prime silva got owned by a few "average" fighters.
It was young and inexperienced pre UFC Silva. Anderson in his prime never lostand yet, prime silva got owned by a few "average" fighters.
What i'm trying to say, Hall and Machida are both strikers who rely on their speed and reflexes, like Anderson himself. The difference here is that Anderson was 10x better, he was just on another level than any other fighter including Mousasiand silva got beat by chonan, takase and bisping..
so what's your point exactly ?
mousasi lost to machida who lost to weidman who lost to.....
It was young and inexperienced pre UFC Silva. Anderson in his prime never lost
What i'm trying to say, Hall and Machida are both strikers who rely on their speed and reflexes, like Anderson himself. The difference here is that Anderson was 10x better, he was just on another level than any other fighter including Mousasi
One time this wrestler knocked Silva off balance so it means moose could finish him.Mousasi would rock Anderson standing, like Chael did, but he'd finish Andy off with his pretty hard and accurate GNP, which Chael didn't really have to end the job with.
Hall won by fluke in the first match. Moose destroyed him in their rematch.Yeah Hall handled him really easily in the rematch and Anderson has takedown defence on the level of Machida.
Shame he can't beat takasePrime Anderson beats any MW and LHW who ever lived except perhaps Jones.
And ? Different fightersAnderson would obliterate him. Didn't Machida whoop his ass out of prime?
So??
Not trying to be a jerk or anything, but which striker did prime as struggle to?Mousasi knows how to feint, jab, stay on top of his hips without overcommitting and has sound fundamentals. Sounds exactly like the type of striker Anderson has shown to struggle with.
Mousasi overrated by some underrated by others. Would be a close match either way.