Report: If not for Republican Policies, Federal Govt. Would Run a Surplus

Higus

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
18,597
Reaction score
1,766
https://www.budget.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/GOP Policies Caused the Deficit REPORT 10-15-18.pdf


https://www.budget.senate.gov/ranki...federal-government-would-be-running-a-surplus

Report: If Not for Republican Policies, the Federal Government Would Be Running a Surplus
WASHINGTON, Oct. 15 – Following an announcement Monday from the Treasury that the federal government ran a deficit of $779 billion in Fiscal Year 2018, the Democratic staff on the Senate Budget Committee released a report showing that the federal government would be running a surplus today if not for four Republican policies.

Without the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the enormous post-9/11 defense buildup and two rounds of costly, regressive tax cuts, the federal government would be running a $156 billion surplus instead of a $779 billion deficit. The Trump Tax Cuts – which coupled permanent corporate tax cuts with temporary individual tax cuts – added $164 billion to the 2018 deficit.

The Bush tax cuts contributed $488 billion to the deficit in FY 2018, the Trump tax cuts added $164 billion, the direct costs of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan ran up $127 billion and base defense increases led to $156 billion in spending.

Instead of spending nearly $1 trillion on the military and tax cuts for the wealthy and large corporations, the federal government could have paid for any of the following proposals – multiple times over for some – in FY 2018 and still balanced the budget.

  • Very nearly eliminate poverty for all Americans of any age. Estimated cost: $174 billion.
  • Pay the one-year average of the 10-year infrastructure funding gap. Estimated cost: $144 billion.
  • Provide high-quality early care and education (ECE) for children from birth to kindergarten. Estimated cost: $140 billion.
  • Eliminate child poverty by simply boosting the income of all families with children (and children who do not live with their families) over the poverty line. Estimated cost: $69 billion.
  • Double the budget of the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the United States Geologic Survey. Estimated cost: $61 billion.
  • Make public colleges and universities tuition-free for working families, cut student loan interest rates in half, and allow every American with student debt to refinance at the lowest interest rate possible. Estimated cost: $60 billion.
  • Double the $1.40 per-meal allowance in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Estimated cost: $70 billion.
  • End homelessness in America. Estimated cost: $22.5 billion.

So for the people around here claiming that social welfare programs to improve healthcare, poverty, and education are too expensive, feel free to tell them that they are cucked good and proper by the MIC and GOP donor class.
 
The Dems are the same, somehow
 
The Dems are the same, somehow

Dirty communist libruls. How dare they want all people have access to affordable housing, medicine, jobs and higher education.

Only conservatards can make those things appear evil
 
Mad?

Higher education and quality healthcare for all really pisses you off doesn’t it?

How dare that brown person have what I have. O wait. You have no higher education haha
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Iraq war was stupid and anyone who was in favor of it should be ashamed.
 
The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan added massive debt. Shocking news. I seem to recall plenty of Dems voting for both, BTW.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-love/who-voted-to-authorize-fo_b_85652.html

I also got a kick out of "the Democratic staff on the Senate Budget Committee released a report showing that the federal government would be running a surplus today if not for four Republican policies."

LOL, at the "War on Terra" being a "republican policy".

Who was President for the last 8 years, again? And who controlled the Congress for the first half of those 8 years?
Hack thread.
 
Iraq war was stupid and anyone who was in favor of it should be ashamed.

Forget about the war. $652B of the $779B deficit is just giveaways to rich people. That's nuts. And it illustrates how a president's impact on deficits neither starts with his inauguration nor ends with him leaving office.
 
Forget about the war. $652B of the $779B deficit is just giveaways to rich people. That's nuts. And it illustrates how a president's impact on deficits neither starts with his inauguration nor ends with him leaving office.

Can you show your math? Looks like the OP article says tax cuts amount to 164 billion. What's the rest?
 
I may be remembering wrong, but didn't both parties agree to those wars?

Also are they really arguing against a post 9-11 defense buildup?
96% Republican support vs 40% Democrat support. Bipartisan by today's standards, i guess, but not a stretch to call it a GOP policy
 
"Deficits don't matter."

- Former Vice President Dick Cheney
 
Thanks. Skimmed over that part. Looks like then the war spending is pretty close to the Trump tax cuts in terms of significance. Too bad those Bush cuts didn't get repealed. Why do you think that didn't happen when Dems had control?

We were in a recession with interest rates as low as they can go. They actually cut taxes for the poor and middle class, and then when it made sense to increase taxes, Republicans were in a position to block it.
 
Back
Top