- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 41,443
- Reaction score
- 0
I had you pegged as more of a, "Sno-Balls" man.Hillary touched my ding dong in 1987
I had you pegged as more of a, "Sno-Balls" man.Hillary touched my ding dong in 1987
It was in the 70s and in Alabama which is 50 years behind, so basically it happened in the 1920s, it was perfectly normal back then.
Also if being a fundamentalist loonie isnt enough to discourage voters, this wouldnt either.
Buy a compact mirror and open it up multiple times a day so you can see how trump happenedIf you think it's 1967 in Alabama, you've never been there. It's 1867. Perpetually fighting the North to retain slaves and fight big daddy gubberment from telling them women have souls and that 4 years old is too young for consent #donttreadonme
Buy a compact mirror and open it up multiple times a day so you can see how trump happened
Alabama has a 50%+1 threshold, meaning if there is a third candidate write in campaign that keeps Jones below 50% than there would be ANOTHER election with the two top vote getters heads up. So if Sen Strange runs a write in campaign and finishes ahead of Moore and Jones is kept below 50% than there would be Strange vs Jones special election sometime in the new year.
Also Alabala law says ballot cannot be changed 76 days out from election. We're 32 days out. But State law can be changed and they have the GOP trifecta down there and could easily change the law with a special session.
So for political purposes this story probably came out about two weeks too soon for Doug Jones and Dems.
It was in the 70s and in Alabama which is 50 years behind, so basically it happened in the 1920s, it was perfectly normal back then.
Also if being a fundamentalist loonie isnt enough to discourage voters, this wouldnt either.
This is a valid concern. I'm guessing the investigation dates back to the middle of the primary, and it's likely WP sat on this vetting/fact-checking, etc. for a bit. But that's not illegal. It's just good business.
Hillary touched my ding dong in 1987
Yeah my aunt was dating my uncle at 15 and he was like 30 with no problem. It would be outrageous today though.He was in his early 30's and the other accusers were 17-19. We're judging folks on things 40 years ago. Sounds really gross now, but in the WaPo article it says the girls Mother's (other than the 14 yr old who he touched sexually over bra and underwear) seemed okay with their underage daughters dating the 32 yr old as Roy was quite the catch.
I bet all of these women are liars though - only accusers of Dems or Dem Supporters are to be instantly believed.
On a side note Louis CK is about to get the NYT Expose "treatment"...
She was actually hot then, congratsHillary touched my ding dong in 1987
You should include a link.
You are an abysmal human beingGood one. It's not racists, morons, and sexual predators that are the problem: it's those librulz who are intolerant of racists, morons, and sexual predators that are the problem.
Keep defending your daddies. Maybe one days you'll be lucky enough to be molested by them too (as opposed to just unwittingly economically exploited like usual).
Also, I don't have a compact mirror. I don't wear makeup like you, snowflake.
Timing should be looked at. Did WaPo sit on this story - when were the women interviewed last? Because reportedly the absentee ballots have been sent out and ballots printed and Moore cannot be struck from the ballot now. If this is a political hit - timing of release will be the proof. Did WaPo wait until Moore couldn't be removed from the ballot to run the story?
Not staying what he did to these girls didn't happen.
How much did you pay her ?Hillary touched my ding dong in 1987
Hillary touched my ding dong in 1987
You are an abysmal human being
Withered it on the vine, ehHillary touched my ding dong in 1987
Point was we are awfully quick to accept these with zero evidence on anyone we don’t likeTell me again how religious fundamentalists who like to fondle underage girls are a big problem again?