Stormy Daniels - "affair never happened"

jgarner said:
I'm really confused by this whole thing now but was she denying it just because she was under the gag order?

I have no idea what's going on now.
Click to expand...
Well, it's a person on twitter linking to "360daily.net" for a screenshot of a facebook conversation that isn't dated and is from a "stormy daniels."
 
Joe said:
Click to expand...


Avenatti came to fight!

th
th
 
JosephDredd said:


Click to expand...

Well that doesn't release her from the NDA as it would mean she still has an NDA with Cohen in regards to her relationship with Trump.

Cohen didn't provide money to a client he provided it to someone his client may or may not have had a relationship with.
 
Fawlty said:
It's incredibly obvious that she fucked him for a job on The Apprentice and he reneged.
Click to expand...
That sounds alot like Harvey Weinsteins mo when you put it that way


But I bet you're spot on
 
AnGrYcRoW said:
That sounds alot like Harvey Weinsteins mo when you put it that way


But I bet you're spot on
Click to expand...
She basically said it herself- the night they had sex, she was asking him about the job and he told her it was hers. She implied it so hard that there was no mistaking it. I'm not sure which interview it's from.
 
thechoice2 said:
Well that doesn't release her from the NDA as it would mean she still has an NDA with Cohen in regards to her relationship with Trump.

Cohen didn't provide money to a client he provided it to someone his client may or may not have had a relationship with.
Click to expand...

Experts have been saying for awhile now that if Trump didn't sign the NDA then it wasn't enforceable.
 
Cake4Breakfast said:
You were going to explain to me how what Cohen did, paying Stormy $130K, didn't constitute an illegal campaign contribution. What happened, you quit because you realized you were full of shit and didn't want to admit that you lost yet another debate with me?


http://www.newsweek.com/trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-illegal-payout-stormy-daniels-860084

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/03/...-his-trump-russia-probe-judge-napolitano-says

th
Click to expand...

There was no debate. It's pure speculation that it was a violation. Nothing has been investigated, nor likely ever will be investigated.

As of right now, and I'd wager until the end of time, it will be determined that it was not an illegal payment.

Keep grasping at those straws though. One day it might be "it".
 
Jopious Extronimous said:
I answered every question you asked.
Click to expand...

The only thing you cleared up was my speculation about your intelligence level, when you admitted to not understanding what I was asking when I said "break it down".

Now, in fairness, you might have just been pulling the most pathetic dick tuck imaginable.

So which is it? Stupid or dick tuck?
 
HereticBD said:
There was no debate. It's pure speculation that it was a violation. Nothing has been investigated, nor likely ever will be investigated.

As of right now, and I'd wager until the end of time, it will be determined that it was not an illegal payment.

Keep grasping at those straws though. One day it might be "it".
Click to expand...


Oh you are priceless, all you have is your opinion (and why shouldn't that matter, after all you are HereticBD on Sherdog:rolleyes:), which you offer with a pompous finality, that it "wasn't a campaign violation" and that it likely will never be investigated, and I am the one grasping at straws!<Lmaoo>

I offer you the opinion of the former head of the FEC under GHW Bush:

“It’s a $130,000 in-kind contribution by Cohen to the Trump campaign, which is about $126,500 above what he's allowed to give,” Potter said. “If he does this on behalf of his client, the candidate, that is a coordinated, illegal, in-kind contribution by Cohen for the purpose of influencing the election, of benefiting the candidate by keeping this secret.”


And I threw in the opinion of Andrew Napolitano (the source of the intel that Trump used when he was alleging that Obama had James Bond "tapp my wires") saying that:

"If it truly came from him, then it was a benefit, it was a donation to the campaign, which vastly exceeds the amount a single person can donate, which is $2,700. And then the campaign's failure to report it to the regulatory authorities was an error -- intentional or inadvertent -- on the part of the campaign."

"I don't think Bob Mueller wants to pull this in, but I think he understands his mission is pulling in whatever he can," Napolitano said.


But yeah, straws!<Lmaoo><45>
 
Cake4Breakfast said:
Oh you are priceless, all you have is your opinion (and why shouldn't that matter, after all you are HereticBD on Sherdog:rolleyes:), which you offer with a pompous finality, that it "wasn't a campaign violation" and that it likely will never be investigated, and I am the one grasping at straws!<Lmaoo>

I offer you the opinion of the former head of the FEC under GHW Bush:

“It’s a $130,000 in-kind contribution by Cohen to the Trump campaign, which is about $126,500 above what he's allowed to give,” Potter said. “If he does this on behalf of his client, the candidate, that is a coordinated, illegal, in-kind contribution by Cohen for the purpose of influencing the election, of benefiting the candidate by keeping this secret.”


And I threw in the opinion of Andrew Napolitano (the source of the intel that Trump used when he was alleging that Obama had James Bond "tapp my wires") saying that:

"If it truly came from him, then it was a benefit, it was a donation to the campaign, which vastly exceeds the amount a single person can donate, which is $2,700. And then the campaign's failure to report it to the regulatory authorities was an error -- intentional or inadvertent -- on the part of the campaign."

"I don't think Bob Mueller wants to pull this in, but I think he understands his mission is pulling in whatever he can," Napolitano said.


But yeah, straws!<Lmaoo><45>
Click to expand...

As I was saying, it's pure speculation.
 
HereticBD said:
The only thing you cleared up was my speculation about your intelligence level, when you admitted to not understanding what I was asking when I said "break it down".
Click to expand...

But that's your fault Heretic. You're such a complete fucking loser, that I honestly thought you were referencing old pro wrestling catchphrases.

If you want to speak clearer next time, let me know. I'll help you understand American.

Now, in fairness, you might have just been pulling the most pathetic dick tuck imaginable.

So which is it? Stupid or dick tuck?
Click to expand...

Your intrigue into tranny techniques aside.... dick tuck?....

Have you answered any questions I asked you Heretic?

No, you didn't. Because you're such a bitch you don't even have a dick, so tucking wasn't an option.

Only running. So just keep on running those circles for me boy. Keep your king happy.
 
Jopious Extronimous said:
But that's your fault Heretic. You're such a complete fucking loser, that I honestly thought you were referencing old pro wrestling catchphrases.
Click to expand...

I guess it's both. Stupid, for trying to pass off such a lame excuse for not grasping what I was asking, and the most pathetic dick tuck imaginable.


You keep those juvenile insults coming though. It's really helping your cause. I truly can't comprehend how you've been banned twice for not being able to control your emotions in here.
 
HereticBD said:
As I was saying, it's pure speculation.
Click to expand...

No, you said it wasn't a violation, and you said it wouldn't be investigated, and all you have in your pocket to back that up is your opinion.

Now you know how much I respect your opinion<Lmaoo>, but I have got to say that in this case, I am going to go with the former head of the FEC, Judge Nap, and every other legal analyst that has weighed in on the subject over you.;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,684
Messages
55,434,356
Members
174,775
Latest member
kilgorevontrouty

Share this page

Back
Top