- Joined
- Jan 7, 2017
- Messages
- 1,291
- Reaction score
- 0
so is the travel ban reversed or not?
yes.
the Supreme Court overturned those liberal judge's decisions also.
so is the travel ban reversed or not?
This reads like a massive hit to government transparency. If that's the case, nobody should be happy about it, no matter what the imaginary scoreboard says.
Also, OP is wrong again about anybody being "reversed."
Why should anyone believe your analysis of a SCOTUS decision when you don't even have a basic understanding of jurisdiction?not the point i'm making.
please keep up.
Why should anyone believe your analysis of a SCOTUS decision when you don't even have a basic understanding of jurisdiction?
Great news
you think that my point has to do with jurisdiction, however it does not.
the lawyers for these anti-Trump cases are an extremely large " National " group of people, who have admitted that they're specifically looking for clients, located on coasts of the country & not the rest of the country.
" National "
i understand jurisdiction.
the problem is you think that my point has to do with jurisdiction, however it does not.
the lawyers for these anti-Trump cases are an extremely large " National " group of people, who have admitted that they're specifically looking for clients, located on coasts of the country & not the rest of the country.
" National " ,not local.
also- if you were to look at my other threads, you'll see that almost all the non-liberal posters who agree with me, have already participated in my detailed breakdown of why its so suspicious, that the automated court-assignment computer keeps spitting out 100% liberal judges.
Politifact is liberal.
their analysis is meaningless.
The lawsuit was brought by multiple state AGs
Incorrectincorrect.
It's insane how much time around here is dedicated to arguing about basic, demonstrable, objective facts with people who don't know what those things are.Incorrect
exactly my point.
lots of lawyers who are a " National " group, choosing to seek lead clients on the coasts of the country, not the rest of the country.
because without a liberal judge, from a coast, they'll lose on their legal arguments.
incorrect.
You can when most of the judges in that area are liberal.1. Not sure who is saying that since there was no final order in the lower court. Still an ongoing case.
2. You clearly have no idea how the Courts work. You can't cherry pick a judge when you are filling in your own jurisdiction.
State AGs, by definition, are lawyers. The "lead client" is their state. Your argument is nonsensical. You should work on learning how our Courts work before pretending to be a legal expert.