You're on point, actually. The fake Russia scandal is intended to distract from the fact that officials inside the Obama administration were using surveillance on Trump's people for political purposes. If there were any evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia, Rice's illegal surveillance would have already been made public.
How about one of your countries parties colluding to keep a candidate out, giving debate questions, colluding with media companies, etc.
Russia's only effort to "undermine" our election, assuming it was Russia, was revealing that the Democrats were attempting to undermine our election. Irony. The whole Russia-Trump collusion narrative is a distraction from the Democrat's corruption (both in efforts to undermine the election and to run surveillance on Trump's people). I would love to be able to say that Rice or others will be wearing stripes for what they have done, but these people always get off.
LOL, you're such a tool for Russia. You don't even understand the significance of the "unmasking" of Rice (hint: there's none).
Recognizing that Russia was pretty much irrelevant as far as "influencing" our election is concerned hardly make me a "tool" for Russia. The Democrats undermined themselves in this past election.
See, this what makes you a tool. You see only the forest. You fail to disentangle what is important from what is unimportant.
You have been asking yourself the same question for months. If Trump, or any of his staff, had "colluded" with the Russians you had better believe that Rice and her illegal surveillance of Trump's people (via unmasking them so that they are identified) would have produced evidence. The empty Russia-Trump collusion accusations are a distraction from the fact that Rice broke the law (something I am sure she didn't think would ever be exposed because she didn't think Trump would win in the first place). If Hillary had won, all of this would have been kept quiet because we all know just how much Democrats like to help each other out.
No, the American people have been asking this question, or at least most of them have, and so far, the evidence turning up has proven those who have remarkably wise.
What the fuck are you talking about? Evidence has been produced. That's why Flynn had to resign and is now asking for immunity in order to save himself by selling Stone and the others out. This is all due in time. American legal procedure works at a snail pace, and our security chiefs have indicated that it will take at least a year for the FBI to conduct its full investigation before turning over everything it has to be (potentially) prosecuted.If Trump, or any of his staff, had "colluded" with the Russians you had better believe that Rice and her illegal surveillance of Trump's people (via unmasking them so that they are identified) would have produced evidence. The empty Russia-Trump collusion accusations are a distraction from the fact that Rice broke the law (something I am sure she didn't think would ever be exposed because she didn't think Trump would win in the first place). If Hillary had won, all of this would have been kept quiet because we all know just how much Democrats like to help each other out.
