- Joined
- Feb 22, 2009
- Messages
- 2,115
- Reaction score
- 3,845
Ok, I’m back. Lee didn’t win that first round.go rewatch and try not to biased. Come back and tell me lee didn't win that first round.
Ok, I’m back. Lee didn’t win that first round.go rewatch and try not to biased. Come back and tell me lee didn't win that first round.
That's cuz you haven't looked into it.Ragin' AL 3-2..all day buddy
Round 5 could be a 10-8.I'll watch again, but I'm certainly not biased. Just look at my sig lol, I'm a Kevin Lee fanboy, and I picked him to win multiple times before this.
I'm just calling it how I see it. The striking exchanges were close in the 1st, but to me Al landed the bigger shots.
LMAO, me and Bravo had 15 bong hits each and looked into it...trustThat's cuz you haven't looked into it.
Possibly. But by usual MMA judging standards I wouldn't say so. Al won that round pretty cleanly, but he didn't have Lee badly hurt or anything.Round 5 could be a 10-8.
I agree. Not saying it happened in this fight, but damn some of these judges are just horrible. Most are pretty bad but we need better judges and not just some bums off the streets.To be honest when one of those judges score it 49-46...the judging is kind of suspect...it's as though the judges don't score all the cards till the last minute after the 5th round is done. So they let the last round influence their judging. Just saying..look into it
Yeah so did I and the rounds Kevin won were only because of top control while doing no real damage. The fact anyone can even make an argument for Kevin winning the "fight" really shows how flawed the scoring system is.1st could've went either way, but I score it for Al.
People need to stop calling close fights robberies.