- Joined
- Jan 25, 2006
- Messages
- 7,313
- Reaction score
- 3,099
Studies have already been done bro.Good luck with getting support for shit level study like that lol.
Studies have already been done bro.Good luck with getting support for shit level study like that lol.
It's shit level in any case bud.Studies have already been done bro.
I don't think that's his perspective, but that's my interpretation.
If you want to look at the social dynamics of the work-place, and more specifically the way women dress, it's better to examine the reward system that exists for women who wear make-up, high heels and present themselves in a "feminine" way.
I don't think it's very relevant why women wear make-up voluntarily unless you're trying to shift the blame from men to women. It seems like a verbose way of saying they kind of asked for it.
Women do have a reward system based on being feminine and attractive. But this system is centred around men, i.e., potential mates for reproduction.I don't think that's his perspective, but that's my interpretation.
If you want to look at the social dynamics of the work-place, and more specifically the way women dress, it's better to examine the reward system that exists for women who wear make-up, high heels and present themselves in a "feminine" way.
Why? It is easy and parsimonious and anyone can replicate and repeat it.It's shit level in any case bud.
I specifically meant the reward system in a business setting, which is primarily run by men. So if you want to accuse women of sexually confusing the men at the workplace by wearing make-up and high heels, and making it difficult for men to "control themselves", well you're just blaming the wrong people.Women do have a reward system based on being feminine and attractive. But this system is centred around men, i.e., potential mates for reproduction.
I am not blaming anyone. Women want to increase their attractiveness to men, but this doesn't mean that this is a clear signal indicating that the women wants the D. The woman will make her selection based on whatever she is interested in, money, sex, or what have you. Or it could also be that she is competing against other women to show that she is the most attractive of the women at work and all men want her PS3. But it is still about men though.I specifically meant the reward system in a business setting, which is primarily run by men. So if you want to accuse women of sexually confusing the men at the workplace by wearing make-up and high heels, and making it difficult for men to "control themselves", well you're just blaming the wrong people.
I'm going to have to disagree on this but I don't think anything would sway you to rethink your position.I am not blaming anyone. Women want to increase their attractiveness to men, but this doesn't mean that this is a clear signal indicating that the women wants the D. The woman will make her selection based on whatever she is interested in, money, sex, or what have you. Or it could also be that she is competing against other women to show that she is the most attractive of the women at work and all men want her PS3. But it is still about men though.
Why do you disagree? There has to be a reason which you can clearly articulate.I'm going to have to disagree on this but I don't think anything would sway you to rethink your position.
You're equating all ritual decoration to sexual attraction and that's baseless. It's late and I'm tired of talking to people on the internet.Why do you disagree? There has to be a reason which you can clearly articulate.
This is why I like Peterson for the most part. He brings our humanity back into the equation in a society where a very toxic culture has taken hold and disparraged the notion that we do things instinctually. Humans are above all others in intellect but we are not above the power of observation when it comes to our nature. We don't do things "just because". We can observe the habitats and rituals of all other animals which is the foundation of our knowledge of these species but when it comes to humans it's "baseless" no....it isn't.You're equating all ritual decoration to sexual attraction and that's baseless. It's late and I'm tired of talking to people on the internet.
You're equating all ritual decoration to sexual attraction and that's baseless. It's late and I'm tired of talking to people on the internet.
I think its more radical then that. I suspect that JP nonetheless believes in personal responsibility in the workplace and so anyone caught sexually harassing a woman should be punished. Rather, I think what he's trying to say is that there are certain fundamental, unconscious qualities and dynamics between men and women that inherently contaminate the workplace to some degree.I don't think he's trying to help interpersonal interactions as much as he's trying to take the blame for sexual harassment at the work place away from the men doing the harassment.
What he is saying is you take some blame for being somewhat provocatively dressed. He obviously beleives in personal responsibility all around by stating this.I think its more radical then that. I suspect that JP nonetheless believes in personal responsibility in the workplace and so anyone caught sexually harassing a woman should be punished. Rather, I think what he's trying to say is that there are certain fundamental, unconscious qualities and dynamics between men and women that inherently contaminate the workplace to some degree.
Rather, I think what he's trying to say is that there are certain fundamental, unconscious qualities and dynamics between men and women that inherently contaminate the workplace to some degree.
I think its more radical then that. I suspect that JP nonetheless believes in personal responsibility in the workplace and so anyone caught sexually harassing a woman should be punished. Rather, I think what he's trying to say is that there are certain fundamental, unconscious qualities and dynamics between men and women that inherently contaminate the workplace to some degree.
Here's the unedited version compared. What a little snake that porshop is, or whoever edited this.