- Joined
- Dec 16, 2015
- Messages
- 45,244
- Reaction score
- 6,619
I'm not willing to do avs for this one, but lemme have a think.Im ok with the odds but since im on mobile and cant see sigs, the sig bet doesnt do anything for me. Av bet instead?
I'm not willing to do avs for this one, but lemme have a think.Im ok with the odds but since im on mobile and cant see sigs, the sig bet doesnt do anything for me. Av bet instead?
Yeah, I wouldn't bet it either. I just enjoy interacting with you.I think Northam is the likely winner, too. I wouldn't bet on him here either, though.
You said he was likely to flip as if he has something to flip on. You have no fucking clue what you're talking about tho
Papadolous just entered a guilty plea for lying to investigators. I'm offering a sig bet or avatar bet, 1-4 years, to be resolved within 6 months:Flip on what exactly?
Papadolous just entered a guilty plea for lying to investigators. I'm offering a sig bet or avatar bet, 1-4 years, to be resolved within 6 months:
I propose that all of the following is correct.
First, Papadolous met with Russian officials/agents, and that those meetings involved "dirt" on Clinton obtained by the Russian government.
Second, and more importantly, in connection with the guilty plea, Papadolous has met with and provided information to the Government in connection with the investigation.
Third, as part of the information provided, Papadolous will or already has provided information that multiple Trump campaign officials were aware of the meetings Papadolous was involved in, and not only did they fail to discourage him, they actually encouraged him to further meetings.
To be resolved within 6 months.
Weird to say that you know nothing about Papadolous, when your posts that I quoted were responding to people talking about him.I know nothing about Papadolous, but the last but intrigues me. Youdbhave to be more specific as to who
Weird to say that you know nothing about Papadolous, when your posts that I quoted were responding to people talking about him.
Let's specify "high level" officials, since it would be absurd to make this about some schlubs. I'm not going to predict specific names, but Trump referred to Papadolous in March by name as a foreign policy advisor, and called him an "excellent guy," so I'm confident that people high in the campaign were pushing him.
Yes, officially. But it's 3 in spirit.
Agreed, the list is quite clear (thankfully for me)
I might be willing to take this bet.Papadolous just entered a guilty plea for lying to investigators. I'm offering a sig bet or avatar bet, 1-4 years, to be resolved within 6 months:
I propose that all of the following is correct.
First, Papadolous met with Russian officials/agents, and that those meetings involved "dirt" on Clinton obtained by the Russian government.
Second, and more importantly, in connection with the guilty plea, Papadolous has met with and provided information to the Government in connection with the investigation.
Third, as part of the information provided, Papadolous will or already has provided information that multiple Trump campaign officials were aware of the meetings Papadolous was involved in, and not only did they fail to discourage him, they actually encouraged him to further meetings.
To be resolved within 6 months.
I might be willing to take this bet.
It might be too easy. I prefer bets with a bit of challenge involved.Do it!
It might be too easy. I prefer bets with a bit of challenge involved.
Come on Jack. I can't disclose that yet.Which part do you think is false?
Come on Jack. I can't disclose that yet.