I said there's a roughly 75% chance of it. And I explained why. There's nothing resembling a strawman there. You've continually insisted, with no basis whatsoever, that Trump is innocent in this. You're denying it now? Or do you just not like the word "pure"? That's not a strawman. The substance is the same. Well, now you're saying that accurately representing your view as expressed in past posting is a "strawman." So that implies that you don't think that Trump is innocent. So why would I ask why you think he's innocent? I guess I can ask why you changed your view. LOL! So you think that FISA would issue warrants appropriately? So then why act like there's something improper? OK.