There's a lot of wild shit going on all at once and over and over again.
Various religions, myths, and legends seem to mirror different scientific hypotheses regarding the universe/multiverse, it's mechanics, it's origins, etc. Is this because we, being made of the universe, have intrinsic programming that we are slowly interpreting through the generations?
James Gates says that he has found sequences that resemble computer code in his equations. Is this evidence of simulation hypothesis or should it be expected that we find such code in everything because we go off of our own ability to process (which our computers have been based upon.)
"Big Bang" was originally a derisive nickname; the idea that the universe had a "beginning" in the face of the laws of conservation of matter and energy was considered preposterous. Does the idea of a yo-yo or resetting universe that would negate this seem less so or is heat death necessary?
Black holes, despite their immense gravity, emit tiny particles (Hawking radiation.) Are these miniature "baby universes" formed from the big bang after the big crunch of a star dying?
Arthur C Clarke once said that man's purpose may not be to worship God but to create Him. This is often interpreted as as a reference to religion but I've always seen as a parallel to Ray Kurzweil's response to whether God exists by answering, "Not yet."
I have come to the conclusion that the universe is not a place. It is not a thing. It is an event.