That literally means nothing in terms of the question of whether or not PEDs work.
For one, their opponents could be using PEDs. Second, the PEDs could work, but simply not to the degree that would make up the difference in natural ability. Or some combination.
Imagine sprinting....
Clean Olympic Sprinter 100 Time: 10.3 seconds
Clean AmericanGazelle 100 Time: 14.0 seconds
Now imagine I take a pill that shaves a half second off my time.
Clean Olympic Sprinter 100 Time: 10.3 seconds
Clean AmericanGazelle 100 Time: 13.5 seconds
"You: The clean sprinter beat Gazelle...the pill doesn't work!"
The only thing that statistic would disprove is that PEDs are magic "auto-win" drugs. Which no one in their right mind believes.
It means nothing to you because you want to believe something and will only accept information that supports your believe. To me, it shows me a broader picture than just "PEDs work because Jon Jones beat DC," well, what about Frank Mir who took the same PED and got one punch KO'd in the first round? LOL
Anybody could be using or not using. However, in the data I posted, fighters were tested and some where negative and others were positive. This is what we know. It is silly to argue about "what ifs" when the test results show what they show.
Again, sprinting, shot-putting, throwing the javelin, doing the long jump and etc is NOT fighting. You can measure if Turinabol is making you a better sprinter, because your time will decrease. However, just because you can sprint faster it doesn't mean you are a better fighter.
You guys are trying to argue because a guy can run a little bit faster and bench a little bit more he will become a better fighter. I am super skeptical about this leap in logic, because it is not support by any evidence. Even if you just take the "eye test" how often do we see explosive looking athlete lose in the UFC.
If you take Sage Northcutt and Bryan Barberena and make them do a circuit of physical exercises, Sage Northcutt will probably perform better than Bryan. He will probably run faster and have a better bench press. But if you put them in that Octagon and close the gate, Sgae Northcutt is getting choked out.
So, my question to you is "How do you measure that Turinabol has made a person a better fighter?" If you give a fighter Turinabol and he loses the fight, how can you tell me, "it improved his fighting ability?" LOL
If you give turinabol to a sprinter, and he starts running faster, then we know (if we control other variables). Fighting is NOT the same. You can take all the Turinabol you want, and a better fighter will beat you regardless.
The competition in sprinting is running a better time, so you if take turinabol and your time improves, you have your evidence. The competition in fighting is beating another human being, and how much Turinabol will help you achieve this, is debatable. Look at the list I posted, fighters who tested positive were more likely to lose than win. This is the truth. It is on record.