J
John Wang
Guest
Why? Because I stated my opinion and disagree with it? Grow up or don't post.And OT shitposters should go back to where they belong.
Why? Because I stated my opinion and disagree with it? Grow up or don't post.And OT shitposters should go back to where they belong.
Why? Because I stated my opinion and disagree with it? Grow up or don't post.
No clue who Donny is, but I belong in this particular thread more than you do and everyone would agree with that. Respond if you agree.You're out of your element, Donny.
LOL!No clue who Donny is, but I belong in this particular thread more than you do and everyone would agree with that. Respond if you agree.
Perhaps the wishes of the locals should be respected, over the desires of environmental activists a thousand miles away that will never even lay eyes on this rock.
This seems to be a rolling back of a previous regulatory overreach, more than the destruction of some sort of pristine environment.
No clue who Donny is, but I belong in this particular thread more than you do and everyone would agree with that. Respond if you agree.
I maintain a large stretch of forest as primarily a hunting property. I've done more to preserve natural ecosystems and species than any environmentalist in my state could ever hope to.No local aren't necessarily the best stewards because they can destroy an eco-system for short term material gain. It happens all the time all over the world. Deforestation, poaching, logging, overfishing, overgrazing, chemical run-offs affecting the water downstream.
Locals may not give a dam if a tortoise or owl or some other species that provides no visible benefit goes extinct, if they benefit monetarily from utilizing the land.
My ownership of a forest shuts off access to other people being able to use said Forest. However, there is lots of public land that people are free to use to hunt or for recreational activity. There's no justifiable reason why beachfront should be treated any different. Some beachfront should stay public, but it's not the end of the world if some beach front is bought, sold, and possessed privatelyRe. the beach issue
If beaches were privatized, only the rich and those fortunate enough to own waterfront land get to enjoy it. People in cali and elsewhere would find it impossible to enjoy the stretches of beaches, if the rich had the right to shut off access. You will be left with access to beaches a long ways from home, or stretches of beach that are not suitable for most activities.
It's still there home.Orrin hatch is bought and paid for, and those grass roots locals supporting this, are as real as BLM is.
It's still there home.
You and I have no business telling them how they should live, or how they should use their own natural resources.
National parks are bad because.
Trees?
Can't get those anywhere else.Fresh water?
How much profit would they get if the entire country was a wasteland?Corporations and republicans would turn this entire county into a waste land if it meant Profits.
America would be one giant paved over mini mall.
How much profit would they get if the entire country was a wasteland?
And do what once every drop is sucked?They would suck every last drop outta the land if they had their way.
And do what once every drop is sucked?