Trump Calls Female Senator "Used" In Provocative Tweet

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

I see you offered lots as usual. Didn't notice another thread showing this article, point me there.

How do Trump boots taste?

Its on the front page for fucks sake

 

[BearGrounds]

Trump is spearheading the degradation of our entire political and social culture. The weeds and degenerates all coming out of the woodwork seeing themselves in Trump. I am fucking disgusted by this president and anyone who can support him.

Lol smh. The anti-Trump sensationalist rhetoric gets straight up ridiculous here at times. Meanwhile....

 

[sangreporsangre]

I like how Pocahontas says that Trump "slut-shamed" Gillibrand. So, uh, do you know something that we don't Elizabeth?

 

[HereticBD]

I like how Pocahontas says that Trump "slut-shamed" Gillibrand. So, uh, do you know something that we don't Elizabeth?

Yeah, old people shouldn't use new, hip terms in an argument. I don't think Warren realizes that she just confirmed and excused Gillibrand's promiscuity, rather than deny it altogether.

 

[franklinstower]

Lol smh. The anti-Trump sensationalist rhetoric gets straight up ridiculous here at times. Meanwhile....

So what your saying is that between the two of us only I can see across party lines.

 

[Anung Un Rama]

Lol smh. The anti-Trump sensationalist rhetoric gets straight up ridiculous here at times. Meanwhile....

wtf am I looking at, John Benét Gacy?

 

[Hollywood Jack]

We all complain about crooked politicians and how we need to rid ourselves of them and once we finally get a president that's not afraid to go against the grain and talk the talk about them....we all start whining and just want the "regular" people back in office to fuck us over again.

Stockholm syndrome.

Trump is the king of corruption and the long con.

 

[Anung Un Rama]

I don't understand how people keep falling for his tweets.

 

[Hollywood Jack]

If he made the same tweet about a man, nobody would give a damn.

He wouldn't make the same tweet about a man, though.

 

[HunterSdVa29]

of all trump tweets to get fake outraged over...

this one?

word?

 

[MilesAbove]

Lol smh. The anti-Trump sensationalist rhetoric gets straight up ridiculous here at times. Meanwhile....

This person..... is awesome, and being productive in society in probably the most fabulous way possible. Trump, on the other hand, is a troll of a human.

100/1 chance you'd be assaulted by Trump before Xochi Mochi does anything even questionable.

The Horror of this satanic message!!!!
"It’s okay to need some help…It’s okay to be a different color…It’s okay to talk about your feelings…It’s okay to eat macaroni and cheese in the bathtub. "

And what a terrible person!!!!
"I got to read to the children today and it was one of the best experiences I’ve been given as a drag queen. It’s so important to have representation and normalize all the letters in LGBTQIA+ in everyday lives. I saw so many excited faces it filled my heart with so much joy and hope to come back again soon! "

 

[Hollywood Jack]

He wouldn't?

There are literally a million tweets where he says the same shit.

You don't see the difference in sexual innuendo when he tweeted about a woman this time? It's glaring.

 

[Hollywood Jack]

What's different?

Saying that she would "do anything" for his campaign contributions. A female coming to a man and saying she will "do anything" to get something from him is a pornographic trope. Also, on the Access Hollywood tape, Trump talks about how when "you're a star" you can "do anything. Grab em by the pussy, you can do anything." Given Trump's track record especially, the implication becomes obvious.

 

[freaky]

Ever the consummate gentleman, Trump had this to say about Kirsten Gillibrand (D/ NY) earlier today:



Given the current climate, many are pointing to this tweet as a perfect example of the implicit sexual "shaming" that women in competitive fields are unfairly subjected to.

Has Trump ever referred to a male senator as "USED"? No. And I think we all know the reason why.

And cue the trumpbot defenses in... 3...2...1...

This has nothing to do with sex. USED means she is being used as in stepping stone or scapegoat. Stop reaching TS.

 

[luckyshot]

Yeah, old people shouldn't use new, hip terms in an argument. I don't think Warren realizes that she just confirmed and excused Gillibrand's promiscuity, rather than deny it altogether.

When my grandmother got on facebook someone told her that "lol" meant "lots of love."

So it was awkward when she started typing "lol" whenever anyone got sick or died.

 

[BearGrounds]

So what your saying is that between the two of us only I can see across party lines.

What I'm saying, is that your post was an example of the ridiculous anti-Trump sensationalism that is often seen in this sub-forum. And that, judging from it, it's hard to imagine you've taken notice of the weeds growing elsewhere.

wtf am I looking at, John Benét Gacy?

Drag queens reading to kids day, at the Long Beach public library (Michelle Obama Neighborhood Library).

This person..... is awesome, and being productive in society in probably the most fabulous way possible. Trump, on the other hand, is a troll of a human.

100/1 chance you'd be assaulted by Trump before Xochi Mochi does anything even questionable.

The Horror of this satanic message!!!!
"It’s okay to need some help…It’s okay to be a different color…It’s okay to talk about your feelings…It’s okay to eat macaroni and cheese in the bathtub. "

And what a terrible person!!!!
"I got to read to the children today and it was one of the best experiences I’ve been given as a drag queen. It’s so important to have representation and normalize all the letters in LGBTQIA+ in everyday lives. I saw so many excited faces it filled my heart with so much joy and hope to come back again soon! "

That person is dressed inappropriately for that environment. Let's not pretend this was about reading books to children.

"Who wants to be a drag queen when they grow up?"

It was about promoting drag lifestyle to them.

 

[franklinstower]

What I'm saying, is that your post was an example of the ridiculous anti-Trump sensationalism that is often seen in this sub-forum. And that, judging from it, it's hard to imagine you've taken notice of the weeds growing elsewhere.



Drag queens reading to kids day, at the Long Beach public library (Michelle Obama Neighborhood Library).



That person is dressed inappropriately for that environment. Let's not pretend this was about reading books to children.

"Who wants to be a drag queen when they grow up?"

It was about promoting drag lifestyle to them.

Well OK. You have demonstrated my point again. The difference between you and I is I can spot more varieties of weeds than you..... I would expect more from someone who sees bigfoot.

The reason you cant imagine me seeing across party lines is because you cant....

 

[BearGrounds]

The difference between you and I is I can spot more varieties of weeds than you.

What makes you think that's the case? Because I think your post was sensationalist? It was. It hung the "degradation of our entire political and social culture" solely around the neck of Trump and his supporters.

That's not demonstrating an ability to see the weeds elsewhere. And there are plenty of weeds elsewhere.

But for me to point out the sensationalism in it, isn't to say it has no merit in anyway whatsoever (so long as the underlying point was reeled in a bit). Has Trump had a negative impact on political and social culture in some ways? Probably so. Is he the spearhead? No. It's a many headed dragon.

 

[franklinstower]

USA Today editorial board doesn't usually do these kinds of articles.

A president who'd all but call a senator a whore is unfit to clean toilets in Obama's presidential library or to shine George W. Bush's shoes: Our view

With his latest tweet, clearly implying that a United States senator would trade sexual favors for campaign cash, President Trump has shown he is not fit for office. Rock bottom is no impediment for a president who can always find room for a new low.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Tuesday dismissed the president's smear as a misunderstanding because he used similar language about men. Of course, words used about men and women are different. When candidate Trump said a journalist was bleeding from her "wherever," he didn't mean her nose.

And as is the case with all of Trump's digital provocations, the president's words were deliberate. He pours the gasoline of sexist language and lights the match gleefully knowing how it will burst into flame in a country reeling from the #MeToo moment....

His words are deliberate on many levels. He is a master of trolling and dishonest misleading communication.
In the real world -- if I am talking to someone and they start using misleading language to bait me into something then I know I am dealing with someone beneath the dignity of the conversation I am trying to have. I mean that. I am not just saying this to burn Trump.....

Trump and his whole approach are far beneath the dignity of the office of president. Who knew I would have to shield my daughter from the level of communication coming from the president?

 

[franklinstower]

What makes you think that's the case? Because I think your post was sensationalist? It was. It hung the "degradation of our entire political and social culture" solely around the neck of Trump and his supporters.

That's not demonstrating an ability to see the weeds elsewhere. And there are plenty of weeds elsewhere.

But for me to point out the sensationalism in it, isn't to say it has no merit in anyway whatsoever (so long as the underlying point was reeled in a bit). Has Trump had a negative impact on political and social culture in some ways? Probably so. Is he the spearhead? No. It's a many headed dragon.

I can see weeds all around-- you said I cant and pointed out a specific example you assumed I would disagree with you on. We have big problems everywhere especially in politics. The difference with Trump is that while being every bit as bad as the worst of politicians he also brings the very worst of it-- what used to be said in private by only the lowest class politicians- right out in the open for all to see and hear.

It is disgusting and creates an environment where the very worst is emboldened in people. Trump is a needle mover and not in a good way by a long shot. To defend him is a disgusting and degenerate act.

But, but, but, Hilary, but but Clinton...... They suck also. Horribly. Bill is probably every bit the sexual degenerate that Trump is. Fuck him. The difference is that aside from hearings on the subject I did not have to worry about Bill corrupting my daughter with his presidential speech.


Also I really doubt that the democratic party would even produce such an idiot as Trump.for president but if they did and he was exactly like Trump I really don't think they would support and defend him like the Republicans are Trump.

I would not that's for damn sure.