You have clearly shown, at this point, to not be open to actually interfacing with the evidence provided in any meaningful matter. For the better part of a week you have had so much information at your disposal. You claim to have read some of it, which I find pathetic, considering you dont seem to have comprehended any of it.
At every turn you have presented wild, baseless strawmen, while refusing the obvious explanations of why animals evolved. You have ignored the genetics, geology and fossil data, without providing any information of your own, save Answers from Genesis.
The last paragraph in this post of yours shows you have no idea what you are talking about, and have no want to do so.
Land reptiles did not come from fish, there's your first catastrophic mistake. Largely discrepant populations that had previously arisen from the water, then evolved land reptile characteristics. Some of these populations ended up developing adaptive advantages based upon their environments that precipitated them going back into the water to eat fish. Some species of reptiles stayed on land all along, some went into the water. Both groups, both land and sea reptiles, evolved into Therapsids and synapsids in hugely discrepant ways.
You present a strawman, I explain why, based upon the evidence, you are wrong, then you simply move on to some other baseless claim.
