Trump crying about Stephen Curry... lol

Ya I was there for it... way to argue 20 points at the same time lol. You're afraid of discussion. You fit right in here on sherdog

Those were not even points, they were examples of simple explanations. lol.
qCbR9GF.jpg
 
LOL at using Answers in Genesis as a source for information about anything but what's in the Book of Genesis.
 
LOL at using Answers in Genesis as a source for information about anything but what's in the Book of Genesis.
I used it as a source for the Hebrew word meaning and that was it. Instead of attacking the source, can anybody demonstraste how they are wrong about the Hebrew?
 
Do I believe that our bodies create blood vessels? Yes. Have you stuck a pencil through your ear or something?

a·bi·o·gen·e·sis
ˌābīōˈjenəsəs/
noun
  1. the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substances.
Do you believe this? Yes or no
 
a·bi·o·gen·e·sis
ˌābīōˈjenəsəs/
noun
  1. the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substances.
Do you believe this? Yes or no

The evidence points towards RNA, or a similar compound giving rise to life. abiogenesis does not really have anything to do with natural selection, though.....
 
The evidence points towards RNA, or a similar compound giving rise to life. abiogenesis does not really have anything to do with natural selection, though.....

I was just curious. We're on another thread now btw bmfeel free to jump in
 
Are you asking me to convince you to defend your position? Do what you want

Do you ever think that if multiple people, across multiple threads, think you are incapable of discussing or comprehending the boundless evidence provided for you, while being dishonest, you think maybe you're dishonest?

Anything aside from a reptile shitting out a monkey seems to not qualify as evidence for you, despite these things being FACTS attested to by reems of physical evidence from multiple fields.
embarrased.gif

This is everyone at you.....
 
Trump sent ONE Tweet about the Warriors and this thread has gone 19 pages (30 ppp)
 
Do you ever think that if multiple people, across multiple threads, think you are incapable of discussing or comprehending the boundless evidence provided for you, while being dishonest, you think maybe you're dishonest?

Anything aside from a reptile shitting out a monkey seems to not qualify as evidence for you, despite these things being FACTS attested to by reems of physical evidence from multiple fields.
embarrased.gif

This is everyone at you.....

Much like how the round earthers were treated at one point. People agree with you therefore you are right? Everybody is making the same refusal to show evidence because they aren't capable of explaining it. Ifnyou are why haven't you done so. Saying it's true over and over like a broken record doesnt make it true. Put up or shut up. See you over there?
 
Much like how the round earthers were treated at one point. People agree with you therefore you are right? Everybody is making the same refusal to show evidence because they aren't capable of explaining it. Ifnyou are why haven't you done so. Saying it's true over and over like a broken record doesnt make it true. Put up or shut up. See you over there?

Round earthers had evidence. Scientists agree based upon the merits of evidence.

You have been provided with dozens of links to papers and studies. Nobody here can read for you.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/15-answers-to-creationist/
 
Round earthers had evidence. Scientists agree based upon the merits of evidence.

You have been provided with dozens of links to papers and studies. Nobody here can read for you.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/15-answers-to-creationist/

Why do you believe fish evolved into amphibians? So far I've heard "similar characteristics, and they're older" as arguments. It should be self apparent why these aren't compelling.

Feel free to post another link without citation though
 
Why do you believe fish evolved into amphibians? So far I've heard "similar characteristics, and they're older" as arguments. It should be self apparent why these aren't compelling.

Feel free to post another link without citation though

So much fluff!! It's all fake!!

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081015144123.htm
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081015144123.htm
http://chem.tufts.edu/science/evolution/fish-amphibian-transition.htm

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-biology/chapter/amphibians/

https://answersingenesis.org/fossil...arly-tetrapods-major-evolutionary-transition/

mind-n-gif-tim-and-eric-12.gif
 
What about this constitutes "crying"? In all honesty, I think you maybe projecting something about your own emotional state. Not trying to be a dick, it's just how this OP comes across

Trump is the bigger cry baby POTUS ever.

Any number of non-brain-dead Sherdog members can easily cite ANY NUMBER OF EXAMPLES.

Anyway.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,662
Messages
55,432,816
Members
174,775
Latest member
kilgorevontrouty
Back
Top