- Joined
- Jan 29, 2015
- Messages
- 62,769
- Reaction score
- 22
See what I mean about presidents setting trends.That has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not it is free.
This one makes not knowing basic facts stylish
See what I mean about presidents setting trends.That has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not it is free.
I haven’t proven anything. I wasn’t trying to prove anything. In my Sherdog years I never witnessed anyone “prove” something to anybody. Just an eternal regurgitation of talking points. I can tell without reading on what side posters will be. I could easily start writing novels over here about how controlled and incorporated freedom isn’t freedom but I just don’t have the time and dedication. My initial point stands - the political discourse of both sides is determined by trump, either faux outrage or retarded nativist pride.You just proved you don't know what the term "free press" refers to.
Go look at the first few chapters of a Journalism 101 course and come back to this armed with facts, not opinions.
Not only that, but if you don't know the facts, you just get to make up your own!See what I mean about presidents setting trends.
This one makes not knowing basic facts stylish
The problem here is indeed one of sides. You're on the wrong side of understanding what the term "freedom of the press" refers to, and instead of acknowledging that mistake, like Donny Moscow and Gen. Kelly, you cling to it as though being mistaken is a personality flaw.I haven’t proven anything. I wasn’t trying to prove anything. In my Sherdog years I never witnessed anyone “prove” something to anybody. Just an eternal regurgitation of talking points. I can tell without reading on what side posters will be. I could easily start writing novels over here about how controlled and incorporated freedom isn’t freedom but I just don’t have the time and dedication. My initial point stands - the political discourse of both sides is determined by trump, either faux outrage or retarded nativist pride.
Holy crap, you can’t possibly have faith in that argument.The problem here is indeed one of sides. You're on the wrong side of understanding what the term "freedom of the press" refers to, and instead of acknowledging that mistake, like Donny Moscow and Gen. Kelly, you cling to it as though being mistaken is a personality flaw.
Refusing to acknowledge an error is a personality flaw.
I don't believe we have anything further to discuss if you can't acknowledge a basic mistake.Holy crap, you can’t possibly have faith in that argument.
You sound like that horrible part of the media that thinks a retreat in imagined moral high ground is somehow a victory lmao.I don't believe we have anything further to discuss if you can't acknowledge a basic mistake.
There's no shame in being wrong, Indrid.
And you sound like a child who uses terms freely and interchangeably without regard for meaning.You sound like that horrible part of the media that thinks a retreat in imagined moral high ground is somehow a victory lmao.
it just sounds like you're in "today i'll just speak to people as if i had power and trump was in front of me".And you sound like a child who uses terms freely and interchangeably without regard for meaning.
In other words, someone to ignore and allow them to go on thinking they're correct.
... You haven't once addressed the facts, you keep throwing up other subjects.it just sounds like you're in "today i'll just speak to people as if i had power and trump was in front of me".
that's why she lost, bro.
wrong about what? about my belief that the media, most of it, is a captured and incorporated instrument and whose current form and activity has no connection to the initial public trust it was entrusted with a long time ago, in order to provide facts for the general public?... You haven't once addressed the facts, you keep throwing up other subjects.
Just admit when you're WRONG.
Full circle:wrong about what? about my belief that the media, most of it, is a captured and incorporated instrument and whose current form and activity has no connection to the initial public trust it was entrusted with a long time ago, in order to provide facts for the general public?
i am definitely not wrong about that.
For those here who were saying "but...but...but...the wife never said anything..."
She was on GMA this morning -
Let's have John Kelly have another Presser and call Myeshia Johnson a liar as well. Let's have Trump tweet that he never said that she's a liar as well. Maybe Trump can even give her a silly nickname when he attacks her.
Yes, the truth cares about politics.Or the left could just stop talking about it...because
What
Does
It
Matter
Investigations lolYes, the truth cares about politics.
That was worth seven investigations, let's ignore what happened here
Donny Moscow .
Yes, the truth cares about politics.
That was worth seven investigations, let's ignore what happened here
Since you so happily paid for them, you ought to know something about em.Investigations lol
We got a tough guy over here!Investigations lol
Well since "niger=benghazi" is in the title, I'll do whatever the fuck i want
That deserves its own threadIn case you didn't read the last weeks news, Russian collusion absolutely happened, and it was between Putin and Bill and Hillary Cremlin.