Trump reaches deal on DACA with dems, no wall

Last time I checked, my president is Trump.

And both sides will come together to strengthen the border, that's good.
Trump lost in that his plans are being watered down and foiled.

His wall is being pushed back again and again and still needs to be "negotiated".


He is like a lousey car sales man that promises a Lamborghini and when you get there its a repo 86 honda with a Lamborghini decal on the bumper.

"HEY!!! He didnt lie!! Technically is a lambo because of the official sticker!! and the car still works!!! MAGA!!!"
 
And now you're applauding that a terrorist group who's committing horrible atrocities hasn't been defeated yet because "heh heh Trump lied about the timeline heh heh".


God you're stupid.

It takes more than a flashy statement to maks me believe a complex problem like Isis would be defeated in 3 months
 
everything he says is and was a lie. It's so obvious unless you're a complete moron
Well... yes.
It all had the sound of a pretty untrustworthy politician's promises.
Especially because in place of specifics, he offered wild additions: "day one", "and it's going to be so easy", etc.
It was like saying he was gonna fix the economy permanently and rewrite US tax code while simultaneously solving the middle East crisis and covering the Moon in a layer of gold foil
 
Well... yes.
It all had the sound of a pretty untrustworthy politician's promises.
Especially because in place of specifics, he offered wild additions: "day one", "and it's going to be so easy", etc.
It was like saying he was gonna give the economy permanently and rewrite US tax code while simultaneously solving the middle East crisis and covering the Moon in a layer of gold foil


If his father wasn't rich he'd be selling used cars out on Staten Island
 
I still want a wall, but a nice one. Like a nice varnished mahogany, or maybe oak.
 
Trump is just rehashing WWE story outlines. This is like his heel turn depending on if you were cheering before.
 
I'm not sure if you are just stupid or purposely being dumb. doesn't matter.

By your standards the United States government has killed zero Native Americans. Do you know why? Because they killed Indians. (Sounds silly doesnt it) The actions didn't change only the name did.
Cool false equivalency bro.

Oh and your additional dodge of a simple yes or no question is noted. Have a nice day.
 
Well done to Trump again for reaching across the isle.
Hopefully much more to come. Trump seems to follow polls & the polls were with the dems on this.

Well done to the Dems for not being babies like the Republicans during Obamas terms & actually working with the President.

The GOP in congress look like fools and idiots.

His base has seen him flip flop and they just make excuses, which is irresponsible because they should be holding him accountable.

Trump knows he can get away with bullshitting because people defend him anyways.

"Liberal tears" for the time being is more important than putting any real preassure on your idol.

Summed it up perfectly.



<Lmaoo><45> "IF true" "IF True" Hannity must be drinking hard. He's such a party hack. He can't bare the thought of working or praising democrats, he went full retard during the election.

IT'LL BE YUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE.



Breitbart comment section is in full meltdown. <Lmaoo> It's glorious. To be fair some of them are principled and are turning their backs on Trump now because immigration was a serious issue for them. Don't feel sorry they got duped though.

It is what it is. As someone who doesn't believe the wall was ever a realistic proposal, this deal is okay. It includes increased border security, and quite frankly if the GOP wants to stall and fuck up every proposal Trump makes, it will also serve as a wake up call to them to get off their asses and quit fucking around, because they aren't the only game in town.

I can't believe it only took 8 months for Trump to turn on his base and expose them as authoritarian worshiping cucks.

Those liberal tears are drying up as the Dems are getting shit done, despite having no government held power. <Moves>
 
1.- Evidence plz.

2.- Mexico lacked liquidity so it asked for a loan, which it got and paid back in full plus interests..
LOL, you should be a politician, Mexico's state planned economy was on the verge of default and the US gave then a cushy deal in NAFTA which allowed business to take advantage of Mexico's cheap labor. I'm surprised the nafta super highway isnt built yet.

How is that a bailout? Bailout would be receiving a loan and never paying back or paying it back without interests.

Well the NYT considered it a bailout
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/02/b...-dramatic-failure.html?pagewanted=all&mcubz=0
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_peso_crisis

http://www.businessinsider.com/looks-like-ross-perot-was-right-about-the-giant-sucking-sound-2011-2

"Perot is famous (among other things) for his statement during the 1992 presidential campaign that if NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) was not a two way street would create a “giant sucking sound” of jobs going south to the cheap labor markets of Mexico.

Both of Perot’s opponents (George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton) argued that NAFTA would create jobs in the U.S. because of business expansion.

However, the goods balance of trade for the U.S. with Mexico has been negative and steadily growing over the years. In 2010 it amounted to $61.6 billion, which was 9.5% of the total goods trade deficit last year.

So Perot has been vindicated in his opinion; expanded free trade has not been accompanied by an increase in jobs in the U.S. relative to the vast numbers of jobs created in the rest of the world as NAFTA became just a stepping stone on the pathway to global commerce.

Just how much the giant vacuum has been collecting has been calculated at GEI Analysis. The results are shown in the following two graphs. The first shows manufacturing jobs lost each year starting with 1992 that are equivalent to the U.S. goods trade deficits over the past 19 years. The second shows the cumulative job loss, amounting to almost 29 million jobs by the end of 2010."

"The last time the United States ran a merchandise trade surplus with Mexico was September 1994—when the U.S. ran a $4,700,000 bilateral surplus with its southern neighbor."
The Global Economy is a global racket. Its purpose: to loot America of her wealth, her manufacturing base and her jobs to enrich a transnational elite that is without loyalty to this nation or to the American people.

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/articl...aight-years-merchandise-trade-deficits-mexico
 
LOL, you should be a politician, Mexico's state planned economy was on the verge of default and the US gave then a cushy deal in NAFTA which allowed business to take advantage of Mexico's cheap labor. I'm surprised the nafta super highway isnt built yet.

It was on the verge of collapse not for being state planned but because it allowed its currency to float after its reserves had been plundered. Mexico has had an independent central bank since then and its currency floats freely.

Mexico never got aid, it got a loan with interests which was paid in full. Only an idiot thinks that a loan is considered a bailout or a handout, i guess Banks are actually charity organizations

http://www.businessinsider.com/looks-like-ross-perot-was-right-about-the-giant-sucking-sound-2011-2

"Perot is famous (among other things) for his statement during the 1992 presidential campaign that if NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) was not a two way street would create a “giant sucking sound” of jobs going south to the cheap labor markets of Mexico.

Both of Perot’s opponents (George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton) argued that NAFTA would create jobs in the U.S. because of business expansion.

However, the goods balance of trade for the U.S. with Mexico has been negative and steadily growing over the years. In 2010 it amounted to $61.6 billion, which was 9.5% of the total goods trade deficit last year.

So Perot has been vindicated in his opinion; expanded free trade has not been accompanied by an increase in jobs in the U.S. relative to the vast numbers of jobs created in the rest of the world as NAFTA became just a stepping stone on the pathway to global commerce.

Just how much the giant vacuum has been collecting has been calculated at GEI Analysis. The results are shown in the following two graphs. The first shows manufacturing jobs lost each year starting with 1992 that are equivalent to the U.S. goods trade deficits over the past 19 years. The second shows the cumulative job loss, amounting to almost 29 million jobs by the end of 2010."

"The last time the United States ran a merchandise trade surplus with Mexico was September 1994—when the U.S. ran a $4,700,000 bilateral surplus with its southern neighbor."
The Global Economy is a global racket. Its purpose: to loot America of her wealth, her manufacturing base and her jobs to enrich a transnational elite that is without loyalty to this nation or to the American people.

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/articl...aight-years-merchandise-trade-deficits-mexico

The article was from 1995, good to see Mexico made all those idiots look like fools when it paid that debt before maturity in which the US government obtained 600 millions in profits.

And lol about Perot, good to see people are still butthurt about him losing.

The deficit is irrelevant, trade has growth exponentially since NAFTA was implemented.
 
Last edited:
1. Let the Dreamers stay and earn citizeship barring no welfare, felonies, and long bouts of unemployment.

2. Pack the Dreamer's parents onto buses and deport them immediately. Allow the Dreamers to leave with their parents if they so choose.

3. Build the wall.

4. Write an executive order for e-verify and harsh penalities for empoyers.


I suppose it would take Hitler or Eisenhower to actually implement what needs to be done as far as immigration is concerned.
 
7D CHESS MOVE

krabs-meme-th.jpg
 
Hispanics overwhelmingly vote for more socialist policies in the USA, so they'll turn the Democrat party further to the left.
Hispanics in the US tend to be somewhat socially conservative, and a majority are Catholics. First-generation (immigrants, note) are skewed more right than second & third. That is balanced out by their generally high support for more services and a large federal government. They are waiting for a GOP that will embrace them, rather than demonize them while using their labor and refusing to recognize them with a legal status. There was a lot of talk about a decade ago about the opportunity the GOP had to make good with Hispanics politically. GOP dropped the ball. Nobody's fault but their own.

http://www.pewhispanic.org/2012/04/04/v-politics-values-and-religion/
 
It was on the verge of collapse not for being state planned but because it allowed its currency to float after its reserves had been plundered. Mexico has had an independent central bank since then and its currency floats freely.

Mexico never got aid, it got a loan with interests which was paid in full. Only an idiot thinks that a loan is considered a bailout or a handout, i guess Banks are actually charity organizations



The article was from 1995, good to see Mexico made all those idiots look like fools when it paid that debt before maturity in which the US government obtained 600 millions in profits.

And lol about Perot, good to see people are still butthurt about him losing.

The deficit is irrelevant, trade has growth exponentially since NAFTA was implemented.

I guess American factory workers are "idiots" for thinking nafta was in their benefit.
Yes they were able to pay it back because of the trade imbalance, 1994 Mexico would have never paid back that 50 billion. Mexico's credit rating in 1994 was barely above junk status .

images


Mexico gets more aide than Harlem.
The United States directs an average of $320 million worth of aid a year to Mexico for various programs, all of which appear to be targets for President Trump as he looks for ways to pay for the proposed border wall with our southern neighbor.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ico-wall-trump-specialists-backfire/97103024/
 
No, they dont.

Hispanics were evenly divided between Sanders (Labour style socialist) and Hillary (Center-right economically).

LOL so they were evenly divided between two globalist far-left politicians. <45><45><45>
 
Back
Top