- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 41,443
- Reaction score
- 0
How so?That goes well beyond freedom of speech.
How so?That goes well beyond freedom of speech.
Did you just compare Alex Jones to Brennan? Get a deep state grip.Alex Jones was stripped of his YouTube clearance, so this guy can fuck off with this deep state victimhood bullshit.
So Mueller may have proof despite not yet showing it, but you are dead certain that I do not have proof because... I have not yet shown it?You yourself have no proof and I know it. Whether Mueller has proof that hasn't been made public yet is another matter.
“Donald Trump’s press conference rises and exceeds the threshold of high crimes and misdemeanours. It was nothing short of treasonous”I couldn't disagree strongly enough with this statement.
Nice deflection but was it much of a presumption on my part? The fact remains that you have no idea if proof has already been collected.So Mueller may have proof despite not yet showing it, but you are dead certain that I do not have proof because... I have not yet shown it?
well duh I mean, that’s the whole pointFrom my post in the Mueller thread, because it's not obvious how security clearances work:
Clearances go away in two stages. They become inactive when you stop working for the government, and they expire some time after that (typically they are good for 15/10/5 years depending on the clearance). It is relatively easy to activate a clearance that has not expired. It is very expensive and time-and-resource intensive to get a clearance again after expiration (and that office of government has been way overworked and understaffed as long as I've known).
Trump seems to be suggesting that, out of spite for a lack of fealty, he's going to revoke clearances, which will make it more difficult (or impossible) for those people to get jobs in areas where they are qualified, and also seems to be suggesting that he will disallow them from getting clearances at all while he is President.
It seems that it was Rand Paul who may have gotten the whole thing started:
I don't know much about this Brennan character other than the fact that he was one of the architects of America's drone program. Generally I wouldn't trust a CIA director worth shit, but this could also be a case of Trump over-reacting to Brennan calling him "treasonous".
It was a pretty bold claim from an ex-CIA director but mouthing off on Twitter alone, shouldn't get your clearance revoked. I think we have to give people more leeway during the age of social media. People lose sight of what they are saying when they aren't doing it in a face-to-face interaction.
Just imagine the scenario of an intelligence chief calling the reigning president a traitor to their face. Hard to imagine it happening.
Let's see if he manages to halt the investigation due to a "DEEP STATE" gang improperly beginning it.Trump explains to WSJ why he acted against Brennan today and threatened the same for others:
“I call it the rigged witch hunt, [it] is a sham,” Mr. Trump said in an interview. “And these people led it!”
He added: “So I think it’s something that had to be done.”
The guy is a complete GUILTY idiot, innocent people don't act this way.
Of course he's acting in exactly the most guilty way possible, every day and at great length. I doubt anybody's guilt has ever been this obvious in a comparable situation. Not trying to invoke "literally Hitler," but this is exactly what Hitler meant about the "big lie." You tell lies so big that your supporters don't believe you'd have the audacity to make it up. It's very common with dictator-types, which is the type of leader he is.Trump explains to WSJ why he acted against Brennan today and threatened the same for others:
“I call it the rigged witch hunt, [it] is a sham,” Mr. Trump said in an interview. “And these people led it!”
He added: “So I think it’s something that had to be done.”
The guy is a complete GUILTY idiot, innocent people don't act this way.
Let me addOf course he's acting in exactly the most guilty way possible, every day and at great length. I doubt anybody's guilt has ever been this obvious in a comparable situation. Not trying to invoke "literally Hitler," but this is exactly what Hitler meant about the "big lie." You tell lies so big that your supporters don't believe you'd have the audacity to make it up. It's very common with dictator-types, which is the type of leader he is.
Fucking Amorosa has security clearance, Jared, Ivanka, Mike Flynn (hahha).Let's see if he manages to halt the investigation due to a "DEEP STATE" gang improperly beginning it.
Same thing except that when you said it you used more wordsYou said it, not me.
Mueller has proof he hasn't shown.So Mueller may have proof despite not yet showing it, but you are dead certain that I do not have proof because... I have not yet shown it?
because he uses and sells highly classified insider informations for political agendasHow so?
It amazes me how often a man in his seventies can act like such a petulant little bitch
Especially for someone so fat
Ok so in this sense the security clearance is analogous to a job and the president has the authority that the boss would. If this makes ZERO sense to you (i.e. you have ZERO ability to process a clearly analogous situation) then you've got bigger problems than this thread.Trump isn't his boss and Brennan hasn't lost any job. Your comparison makes zero sense.
And the pot calls the kettle black. Typical.Just shitty, snide remarks, and post hoc justifications. Typical.