I believe that was my first. But I trust that you will bring it up in every post and in every exchange from now until nirvana because you're an immature child who is incapable of arguing on a topic.
That's not the point of contention.
But for starters, I would like to have a president who understands recent world history and isn't stupid enough to threaten a sovereign nation, that is retaining and developing nuclear arms for the purpose of being its only line of defense, that if it doesn't disarm it will suffer the same fate as a leader/country that was destroyed after it surrendered its arms pursuant to a cooperative effort.
The fact that you cannot understand the stupidity, irony, and all-around imperial shittiness of this wet fart of a threat is pretty hilarious. Your willful ignorance to the arrogant incoherence of the statement and the administration in general is priceless.
As far as my policy preferences (which, again, are irrelevant), I have been open about how I would like the DPRK situation addressed: complete recognition of sovereignty and international standing, removal of sanctions, and further scale economic investment in and proportional arming of South Korea. That has been my stance for years. But that doesn't matter to you, because my stance was never relevant to your sycophancy and relentless cock sucking.
