Trumps travel ban blocked?

[zebby23]

HAHA, another loss by the Trump administration.

I also see that Trumps foreign policy adviser Carter Paige is being subpoenaed to testify and that he will plead the 5th? Coward!!

Finally, Trump finally came around and restored those Obamacare subsidies that he cruelly took away to poorer Americans.

My goodness can this guy get anything right? I'm getting a little of tired of winning, when is Trump going to pass a campaign promise?

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355851-senate-panel-subpoenas-carter-page-report

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...6288544af98_story.html?utm_term=.ea75a3daefad

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/17/politics/health-care-csr-payments-deal-reached/index.html

 

[zebby23]

Looks like a Hawaiian judge blocked Trumps travel ban now for the 3rd time. Again Hawaii saves the day

 

[syct23]

Aloha...


See you again..

 

[klnOmega]

The higher courts are going to have bitchslap those retards again?

 

[JDragon]

Personally I really have a hard time understanding the US court system. How is SCOTUS not already dealing with this?

 

[zebby23]

The higher courts are going to have bitchslap those retards again?

Quality post by a quality poster

 

[zebby23]

Personally I really have a hard time understanding the US court system. How is SCOTUS not already dealing with this?

I think it has something to do with how the order keeps changing. Good question though

 

[klnOmega]

Personally I really have a hard time understanding the US court system. How is SCOTUS not already dealing with this?

SCOTUS keeps telling Hawaii to fuck off, and Hawaii just keeps coming back to get their ass kicked again and again.

 

[zebby23]

SCOTUS keeps telling Hawaii to fuck off, and Hawaii just keeps coming back to get their ass kicked again and again.

Must obey trump no matter what. Russian bot confirmed

 

[m52nickerson]

SCOTUS keeps telling Hawaii to fuck off, and Hawaii just keeps coming back to get their ass kicked again and again.

No, they have not.

 

[zebby23]

No, they have not.

Yes, Hawaii blocked it.

To answer the Supreme Court question it looks like the Trump administration just keeps changing it to avoid having to have it scrutinized in the Supreme Court

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/25/us/politics/trump-travel-ban-supreme-court.html

 

[Bunk Moreland]

Personally I really have a hard time understanding the US court system. How is SCOTUS not already dealing with this?

I think that SCOTUS decides what it wants to hear and what it doesn't. Maybe they think the lower courts have gotten it right. Or the administration hasn't filed a brief to SCOTUS to review yet.

 

[m52nickerson]

Yes, Hawaii blocked it.

To answer the Supreme Court question it looks like the Trump administration just keeps changing it to avoid having to have it scrutinized in the Supreme Court

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/25/us/politics/trump-travel-ban-supreme-court.html

I was saying that the Supreme Court has not told Hawaii to back off.

 

[zebby23]

I was saying that the Supreme Court has not told Hawaii to back off.

Ohhh. thanks for clarifying

 

[bobgeese]

This will end the same way the others did, thrown out by the SC.

The fact that the left will have to deal with (and someday the right may have to), is any president has the right to set immigration policy.

 

[Teppodama]

Maybe it's time for some deep diving into this judges life and associates...

 

[ocfightfan]

Fine, all ISIS members captured alive can be housed in that judges chambers.

 

[Philo-Publius]

Personally I really have a hard time understanding the US court system. How is SCOTUS not already dealing with this?

The ruling has to be kicked up to the Supreme Court for appeal. This federal judge is clearly ignoring the constitution and case law.

Watson also wrote that the executive order “plainly discriminates based on nationality” in a way that is opposed to federal law and “the founding principles of this Nation.”

The judge's statement above is absolutely irrelevant to the law. The president clearly has the power to restrict immigration from specific countries. #NoRespectForTheLaw

 

[panamaican]

Personally I really have a hard time understanding the US court system. How is SCOTUS not already dealing with this?

SCOTUS will only hear matters that are currently relevant. This means that every time the administration changes the language of the law, the previous version of that law is no longer relevant and SCOTUS won't hear it.

Think about it like asking your teacher to edit your paper. If you write a new paper, there's no reason to edit the old one. Instead you ask the teacher to edit the new paper, which makes sense. At least, until you write a 3rd paper and suddenly editing the 2nd paper as irrelevant as the first.

 

[HomerThompson]

This will end the same way the others did, thrown out by the SC.

The fact that the left will have to deal with (and someday the right may have to), is any president has the right to set immigration policy.