Trumps travel ban blocked?

I did not so much as intimate that, whatsoever. Many people want to see the list refined, with the state sponsors most prevalent in the export of Jihadism included. The mere fact that three distinct executive orders have been issued by the President, and none have included Saudi Arabia, shows me that the President is not serious, nor capable in his assessment of this problem.


Show me more than a single sitting member of congress on the left who has opposed the ban for this reason.
 
Since when does congress represent all of conservatism or liberalism?



They quite literally REPRESENT you.

But since I understand your poor choice of words there, for every 1 liberal who feels how you do, I could find you a hundred who are shouting Nazi racist fascist orange Hitler.
 
We need the travel ban. Look at what muslims did to Sweden, Paris, and London.

Liberalism is a disease that needs to be cured. When everyone warned of the consequences they were called islamaphobics.

Rape, murder and crime are skyrocketing in all those countries now. I think rape is up 80% in sweden

Wait for it

Travel ban which is supposed to prevent Islamic terrorism left out Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Egypt.... countries whom islamic terrorists that attacked the US in the past were actually from.

Without those countries, the travel ban is basically the same as an assault weapon ban... "feel good" legislation which does nothing to actually address the problem.


regular.jpg
 
https://archive.fo/Am4f8#selection-819.0-819.62
Supreme Court dismisses Hawaii's challenge to Trump travel ban

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday formally dropped plans to hear the last remaining challenge to an earlier version of President Donald Trump’s travel ban targeting several Muslim-majority countries and a ban on refugees, but a fight over the legality of his latest restrictions still could reach the nine justices.

The high court said it will not hear the case brought by Hawaii over the bans, which have expired and been replaced with revised policies. Trump’s 120-day ban on refugees ended on Tuesday and is set to be replaced by a new set of restrictions.

Two lower courts have blocked Trump’s new ban targeting people from eight countries, Trump’s third set of travel restrictions, and the issue could find its way back to the Supreme Court on appeal.

The court on Oct. 10 disposed of the first of two travel ban cases -- brought by the American Civil Liberties Union and others in Maryland -- after Trump’s earlier 90-day ban on people entering the U.S. from six predominantly Muslim countries expired on Sept. 24. It was a replaced with a modified, open-ended ban involving eight countries.

The justices had been scheduled to hear arguments in the two consolidated on Oct. 10.

Among the issues raised by challengers was whether the travel ban discriminated against Muslims in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s prohibition on the government favoring or disfavoring a particular religion. The same arguments are being used against the new ban.

Trump has said the restrictions were needed to prevent terrorism in the United States.

The expired ban had targeted people from Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and Sudan. The new ban removed Sudan from the list and blocked people from Chad and North Korea and certain government officials from Venezuela from entering the United States.

If the new restrictions go into effect, they could block tens of thousands of potential immigrants and visitors to the United States. Trump had promised as a candidate “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,893
Messages
55,451,445
Members
174,783
Latest member
notnormal
Back
Top