There's not more outrage at that joke of a decision? I was sure the consensus would be that TT "easily" won it, and got robbed. Albeit she fought really dumb, I don't see how she could've possibly lost the 3rd round after clearly winning the standup and landing much harder shots. I guess a takedown without any strikes with 1min left, while getting outworked from the bottom is enough to win rounds again? Pretty pathetic, probably on par (or worse) than Davis vs. Machida.
Sure, let's give the Sarah Kaufman vs. Dufresne decision to Kaufman after spending 13 min on the ground with 7 of those in sidecontrol, for landing slaps to the ears and love handles, and let's give Ferguson the win over Castillo on the bottom, but here let's allow that Daviseque takedown to win the fight. Now there's even more inconsistency in juding, you have the ones overvaluing top control just as before, and the other group who prob have no idea what's going on but have either been reprimanded or got some bad press and now want to give fights to the bottom fighter too eagerly (but only if said fighters swing their hands like an orangutang and land flashy insignificant blows; awarding it to the one on the bottom in a fight like Hioki vs. Guida or MM vs. Miguel Torres would still never happen). So yeah hooray for more inconsistency I guess.