And yet, Pacheco is arguably a better win than anyone Pannie has beaten in her own career, TUF included.
This is pure hindsight bias, anyways. Going into TUF, Pannie, who had suffered an embarrassing 3-fight losing streak from 2015 to the beginning of 2018, wasn't considered substantially better than Pacheco.
Letson was "winning" the 1 minute of stand-up where each fighter connected with about 2 insignificant strikes each? And this is what you judge Macy's striking on? I recommend going back and watching her Invicta 29 fight.
As for the clinch, what are you talking about here? Macy took Letson down, ground-and-pounded her, and then proceeded to finish her with knees to the body when she stood back up.
Letson lost the clinch battle about as badly as it's possible to.
What fights are you watching here? Lehner was winning the round until being taken down, and then Pannie won the second by immediately taking her down there, too.
As for the fight against Stoliarenko, wow. If you think Pannie's face looking like it went through a meat grinder was the result of "2 jabs", I don't know what to tell you, except you're not watching the fights very closely.
Incidentally, not even Pannie's own corner agrees with you that she was "dominating the whole fight", as they thought the first was very close, and one judge gave that round to Stoliarenko.
By this sterling logic, Pacheco should have destroyed Macy, too. How did that one turn out?
Yeah, we really have no common ground here. As an amateur boxer, I can say that Pannie's "left hook" is one of the worst abominations I've ever seen, even by the standards of WMMA.