US Senator Black publicly claims MI6 planning false flag chemical attack

Lying and falso flag are common practices of Uncle Sam. See Iraq and Libya for recent examples.
 
* state senator

What a monstrously bigoted cunt though.

In 2005, he resurrected his legislation that would ban gay people from adopting children, claiming that gay people were more prone to violence, alcoholism, and suicide.[6] He then amended the bill to require that adoption agencies investigate whether people looking to adopt children were "known to engage in current voluntary homosexual activity".[6] In February of that year, he urged his constituents to picket Stone Bridge High School for putting on a play about a gay football player, claiming that the school was "being used to promote a homosexual lifestyle."

He further claimed that attempts to "encourage homosexual activity, to portray it in a cute or favorable light" could lead to children contracting HIV.[24] In 2004, he said with regard to Virginia's sodomy law: "If I'm the last person on the face of this Earth to vote against legalizing sodomy, I'll do it."[25]
Sodomite detected.
 
Lying and falso flag are common practices of Uncle Sam. See Iraq and Libya for recent examples.
How was Libya a case of false flag or lying? Gaddafi basically bragged about how he was going to create a bloodbath. Shouldn't do that when you've stepped on as many toes as he had.
 
I so wish Trump had been successful in ordering the assassination of this guy. It would have been win-win from where I sit: No more Assad and Trump eventually on trial for war crimes.
 
It is all about which side you want to believe, the West or Russia/Syria/ Iran.

This is why people need to join team Conspiracy Theory like me. Why choose between two groups that are invested in lying to you?
 
It is all about which side you want to believe, the West or Russia/Syria/ Iran.
After all things they did in there years how one can believe or trust "the west" is beyond me.
 
How was Libya a case of false flag or lying? Gaddafi basically bragged about how he was going to create a bloodbath. Shouldn't do that when you've stepped on as many toes as he had.
I wonder how an adult can wrote those things..
 
I wonder how an adult can wrote those things..
Write what? Got something to say then say it clearly.

The Libya intervention was a mistake but there was no lying involved, Gaddafi openly talked about massacring the rebels and the West opportunistically used it to justify their misguided intervention.
 
How was Libya a case of false flag or lying? Gaddafi basically bragged about how he was going to create a bloodbath. Shouldn't do that when you've stepped on as many toes as he had.
Libya was supposed to be a no fly zone, which NATO used as a shield for their bombing campaign.
 
Libya was supposed to be a no fly zone, which NATO used as a shield for their bombing campaign.
Alright fair enough, forget about that detail. Now that you mention it I remember the Arab League voted in favor of the NFZ but when the West started bombing the shit out of Libya they changed their tune and complained about the abuse of the UN mandate.
 
Trump eventually on trial for war crimes.

giphy.gif
 
* state senator

What a monstrously bigoted cunt though.

In 2005, he resurrected his legislation that would ban gay people from adopting children, claiming that gay people were more prone to violence, alcoholism, and suicide.[6] He then amended the bill to require that adoption agencies investigate whether people looking to adopt children were "known to engage in current voluntary homosexual activity".[6] In February of that year, he urged his constituents to picket Stone Bridge High School for putting on a play about a gay football player, claiming that the school was "being used to promote a homosexual lifestyle."

He further claimed that attempts to "encourage homosexual activity, to portray it in a cute or favorable light" could lead to children contracting HIV.[24] In 2004, he said with regard to Virginia's sodomy law: "If I'm the last person on the face of this Earth to vote against legalizing sodomy, I'll do it."[25]
in B4 he gets caught up to smutty business in a public restroom...
 
Alright fair enough, forget about that detail. Now that you mention it I remember the Arab League voted in favor of the NFZ but when the West started bombing the shit out of Libya they changed their tune and complained about the abuse of the UN mandate.
Well at least I get a laugh out of Europe eating shit from the flood of migrants now crossing from Libya. You reap what you sow.
 
Id be like a lot of people here who think it wasnt Assad if it wasnt for the fact he BARRED chemical experts from other countries not just the US from entering. You only do that if you are guilty and the rest of the world rightly felt so.

"Chemical arms inspectors were blocked on Monday from the site of what is suspected of having been a poison attack by Syria’s military near Damascus, raising Western suspicions that Syria and its Russian ally were scrubbing the stricken area of evidence.Who was responsible for the blocking, and why, quickly became part of the international recrimination and invective that have shaped blame over the Syria war since it began more than seven years ago.
The inspectors, from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, arrived in Syria on Saturday with the urgent goal of investigating the site of the April 7 attack in the Damascus suburb of Douma, which killed dozens.
But 48 hours later the inspectors were prevented from reaching the site, which Syrian and Russian forces have captured from rebels.
The inspectors, who wanted to take samples and interview people, “are currently being prevented from doing so by the regime and the Russians,” Prime Minister Theresa May of Britain said in Parliament."
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/16/world/middleeast/syria-douma-chemical-attack.html



What IMO they deserved and more. (thank you US,UK, and France) A warning strike is better then doing nothing.



 
Id be like a lot of people here who think it wasnt Assad if it wasnt for the fact he BARRED chemical experts from other countries not just the US from entering. You only do that if you are guilty and the rest of the world rightly felt so.

Maybe they are hiding something, but you're jumping to conclusions without any evidence.

Russia and Syria cited security concerns when OPCW inspectors first wanted to inspect the site.

The site is in the middle of an active war zone, territory just recently liberated from militants well known for their use of IEDs and other booby-trap devices.

As much as other countries tried to ridicule their explanation.... it seems perfectly plausible there would be some pretty gigantic security issues with bringing unarmed civilians into an area like that.
 
Maybe they are hiding something, but you're jumping to conclusions without any evidence.

The evidence is not letting other countries in to collect possible evidence. Nothing screams guilty more than that. All they had to do to prove their innocence was let them come in collect what they need and go.
We bring in news reporters from TV into active warzones.
There are no excuses.
If they wanted to go, let them if you are so innocent. But alas most of the world agreed they werent hence the bombing from multiple countries.

(news reporter in active warzone being shot at, we do this a fair amount, so its really not an excuse to not let an agency who is used to working in these conditions and who wants to come in and test.)
 
"UN: Syria's Idlib could face worst catastrophe this century"

Story: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/un-syrias-idlib-could-face-worst-catastrophe-this-century/

"A top U.N. official warned Monday that an attack on rebel-held parts in Syria's Idlib in coming months could lead to this century's worst loss of life as government forces pounded the area from the air and ground."

This should be interesting with U.S. and British forces on the ground in Idlib. Also, the U.S. media is not reporting U.S. casualties in Syria.
 
The evidence is not letting other countries in to collect possible evidence. Nothing screams guilty more than that. All they had to do to prove their innocence was let them come in collect what they need and go.
We bring in news reporters from TV into active warzones.
There are no excuses.
If they wanted to go, let them if you are so innocent. But alas most of the world agreed they werent hence the bombing from multiple countries.

(news reporter in active warzone being shot at, we do this a fair amount, so its really not an excuse to not let an agency who is used to working in these conditions and who wants to come in and test.)


Well that's a video of journalists escorted by troops to an area somebody thought it was okay for them to go. Obviously somebody fucked up..... it probably wouldn't look good if the same thing happened to the OPCW inspectors.

I don't know why you seem so certain Assad was to blame. Do you not think it's a possibility somebody on the rebel's side could have mixed a few bottles of bleach and ammonia, and put it in one of the improvised gas canister cannons they're all to proud to show off to the media?

If there was somebody in the neighborhood flinging random canisters of chlorine around, that would definitely be the type of thing that would be deemed a security risk, and prevent the military from escorting civilians to the site.

HellCannon.jpg
 
Back
Top