War Room OT Discussion v5

[Trotsky]

Ford Dogs.

I don't know what this means.

Also, is there no sovereign immunity for the president?

I give Rubio cre--

 

[HomerThompson]

I don't know what this means.

Also, is there no sovereign immunity for the president?

The former Mayor of Toronto, and former living man, Rob Ford.

Combine that with his wacky hot dog related antics, and you've got Ford Dogs.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Do we have a War Room "recommended reading" list or thread yet?

If so I would love to have a look, and if not it might be a good idea.

Put my vote down for Hustler. Larry took a bullet for this country.

He just started to explain that for an assault rifle ban to be effective they would have to ban all semiautomatic rifle and the place erupted into cheers and Rubio was like "uhh I guess that's a fair position to take."

So he spoke the semi-truth and the scumfucks looking to give away rights they don't choose to enjoy showed their true colors?



Any non-ignorant and honest person knows that's the next plateau of infringement. Then self-defense will pretty much have 3-barrels on it. Hint: Self-defense is the shark.

 

[senri]

Rick Scott looks like a vampire guy from 30 days of night.

Absolutely not...

 

[senri]

And I’m a human being....

Yes.... Yes you are Mr Cracker....

 

[Rational Poster]

Absolutely not...

 

[PolishHeadlock]

So he spoke the semi-truth and the scumfucks looking to give away rights they don't choose to enjoy showed their true colors?



Any non-ignorant and honest person knows that's the next plateau of infringement. Then self-defense will pretty much have 3-barrels on it. Hint: Self-defense is the shark.

"
The District of Columbia v. Heller ruling still looms large today because it left open a lot of questions that are now at issue. Consider semi-automatic weapons like the AR-15 rifle, which has been used in a number of high-profile shootings, including the deadly massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012. Are bans on this kind of weapon allowed under Heller?

On Monday, the Supreme Court let Connecticut’s ban on such weapons remain. It did the same in December after an effort to overturn a similar ban in Highland Park, Illinois. That doesn’t mean the court is embracing these bans, only that it’s put off ruling on them to another day. If the court takes them up, and at some point it surely will, its decision will come back to Scalia’s famous opinion in the Heller case.

And how the justices would rule on the constitutionality of owning an AR-15 is up in the air. Despite his deserved conservative reputation, Scalia left some gifts for liberals in his Heller ruling. He wrote that the right to bear arms had limits. “Nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”

The late justice also more generally offered the belief that “like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited.” It is “not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” For instance, Scalia said concealment laws were permitted at the time of the Constitution’s ratification and should be permitted today.

The issue that Scalia left future courts to grapple with is what constitutes a protected weapon. He wrote that the Constitution protects weapons that could be carried and were in common use. What he didn’t say in the opinion—and what the court has deferred ruling on—is whether an AR-15 fits the bill for a common weapon. On one hand, it’s certainly not rare. There are more than a million in circulation. On the other hand, it’s not as ubiquitous as ordinary rifles and handguns. At some point, the John Roberts court will wrestle with the questions Scalia left unanswered, or the justices will leave it to the political process."

http://www.newsweek.com/antonin-sca...rt-orlando-shooting-newtown-sandy-hook-472460

 

[Big Nasty Edison]

Imagine me taking advice from someone who makes roughly 6,000 posts a year - you are the last person to lecture others on well-adjusted behaviour.

Judging by the way he spells behavior he can't be registered cause he's not from America

@HereticBD alt account confirmed.

 

[Final Rehab]

When besmirching someone's name, I prefer the Middle Eastern custom.

Easily the high point of W's presidency. Nice head movement; Luke Rockhold should hire him as a coach.

 

[The Spirit Molecule]

Taking bets on whether @The Spirit Molecule is a previous ban or an alt of an active acct that doesn't like reply bans.

The paranoia is hilarious at this point - you lefties are a bunch of conspiracy theorists in everything eh?

Can I be in on this bet? If you lose, you're banned. You in or you gonna pussy out? If @Edison Carasio finds his cajones he can be in too. This'll be fun.

 

[Jack V Savage]

The paranoia is hilarious at this point - you lefties are a bunch of conspiracy theorists in everything eh?

Can I be in on this bet? If you lose, you're banned. You in or you gonna pussy out? If @Edison Carasio finds his cajones he can be in too. This'll be fun.

There's no doubt that you're one of the two (and a liar because you're denying it). No one discovers Sherdog and then goes straight to the WR and immediately gets super aggro and starts parroting right-wing propaganda. The only issue is whether it can be proved.

 

[The Spirit Molecule]

There's no doubt that you're one of the two (and a liar because you're denying it). No one discovers Sherdog and then goes straight to the WR and immediately gets super aggro and starts parroting right-wing propaganda. The only issue is whether it can be proved.

Do you want in on the bet? Love to have you banned as well.

I've said it before but it's immaterial what you believe. I already stated how I found this forum. I came here to read an expansive Jordan Peterson post that I had found via Google. I looked around the rest of the forum and have read the War Room convos as a non-member for a while and decided to join to combat at least some of the lunacy.

Right-wing propaganda? More lunacy. Please do us a solid and take the bet. Quipling has shown a lack of testicular fortitude, don't be like him.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Love to have you banned as well.

Why is that?

Here's the thing, chief: Whether you admit it or not or the mods prove it or not, you and everyone reading this knows that you're lying. You can't do anything about your mental issues, but you do have the power to restore your dignity and to start to restore your character. Good luck with both.

 

[AnGrYcRoW]

The paranoia is hilarious at this point - you lefties are a bunch of conspiracy theorists in everything eh?

Can I be in on this bet? If you lose, you're banned. You in or you gonna pussy out? If @Edison Carasio finds his cajones he can be in too. This'll be fun.

Joined: saturday

 

[The Spirit Molecule]

Why is that?

Here's the thing, chief: Whether you admit it or not or the mods prove it or not, you and everyone reading this knows that you're lying. You can't do anything your mental issues, but you do have the power to restore your dignity and to start to restore your character. Good luck with both.

People who cannot have a rational discussion without jumping to conclusions just ruin forum atmosphere. The above is further proof of it.

The mods or whoever can check me. I've never been registered on this forum before and it's hilarious to me how threatened you are by it. So because, you know, I'm me and I know the truth...it's easy to make this bet.

Stop being a pussy and take the bet. Get HomerThompson in on it too. You accuse easy and then when it comes to the crunch you hide? Why not just, you know, post and have discussions like a normal human being? Anyway, stop wasting the forum's bandwidth and take the bet already. Show your dignity <45>

Joined: saturday

You can take the bet too, come on .

 

[Jack V Savage]

People who cannot have a rational discussion without jumping to conclusions just ruin forum atmosphere. The above is further proof of it.

The mods or whoever can check me. I've never been registered on this forum before and it's hilarious to me how threatened you are by it.

Where do you see any signs of anyone being threatened?

Lots of people posting here have been banned before and freely admit that. There's nothing wrong with it. If you're trying to circumvent a reply ban or something, that is a problem, but I think that's less likely (the mods would probably be on top of it). But either way, what I commented on was the fact that you're obviously lying. Just seems to be a kind of thing with the right these days that they have trouble telling the truth.

 

[The Spirit Molecule]

Where do you see any signs of anyone being threatened?

Lots of people posting here have been banned before and freely admit that. There's nothing wrong with it. If you're trying to circumvent a reply ban or something, that is a problem, but I think that's less likely (the mods would probably be on top of it). But either way, what I commented on was the fact that you're obviously lying. Just seems to be a kind of thing with the right these days that they have trouble telling the truth.

That's great, but I haven't been banned before because I've never registered before.

Where do I see signs of being threatened? You and your friends cannot debate me on the points so you concoct some nonsense about me being an alt. And even after having it explained to you, you still don't let up. You're calling me a liar - ad hominem - you are threatened and acting like a coward. You have made a claim you won't even stand by.

Take the bet: if you lose, you are banned and never return - if I lose the same (P.S. I'm not going to lose because I'm not lying).

 

[PolishHeadlock]

Do you want in on the bet? Love to have you banned as well.

I've said it before but it's immaterial what you believe. I already stated how I found this forum. I came here to read an expansive Jordan Peterson post that I had found via Google. I looked around the rest of the forum and have read the War Room convos as a non-member for a while and decided to join to combat at least some of the lunacy.

Right-wing propaganda? More lunacy. Please do us a solid and take the bet. Quipling has shown a lack of testicular fortitude, don't be like him.

Lol you joined a karate message board political subforum because you found a Jordan Peterson thread here.

A very well adjusted young man indeed.

Is your room clean?

 

[Ruprecht]

That's great, but I haven't been banned before because I've never registered before.

Where do I see signs of being threatened? You and your friends cannot debate me on the points so you concoct some nonsense about me being an alt. And even after having it explained to you, you still don't let up. You're calling me a liar, ad hominem, you are threatened little man.

You have made a claim you won't even stand by. Take the bet: if you lose, you are banned and never return - if I lose the same (P.S. I'm not going to lose because I'm not lying).

Account bets aren't actually allowed here. From all appearances though you don't seem to be a retread.

 

[HomerThompson]

Lol you joined a karate message board political subforum because you found a Jordan Peterson thread here.

A very well adjusted young man indeed.

Is your room clean?

<puh-lease75>

You know that it's not.