- Joined
- Apr 28, 2012
- Messages
- 2,028
- Reaction score
- 428
Tell that to Ruiz and HolyfieldToney was a fat lump of shit at heavyweight though.
Tell that to Ruiz and HolyfieldToney was a fat lump of shit at heavyweight though.
This is good. Tho I think the WBC are also trying to protect their own interests. Not that I don't think it should happen
Im not watching this corrupt sport anymore after the last one. Especially wbc fights. Most corrupt santioning body ever
What u doin watching it anymore? You just a little puppyYeah it’s best you don’t watch the sport anymore. This is for the big dogs only.
Im not watching this corrupt sport anymore after the last one. Especially wbc fights. Most corrupt santioning body ever
What u doin watching it anymore? You just a little puppy
Now that is something i can supportUFTC is your calling! Ultimate Fighting Transgendered Championship!
Not really. The wbc and it's franchise looks better and gets off on being on a single person like Deontay instead of being lumped in with unified belts.. that's what I'm saying.Protect? Here forward they make money on Wilder regardless, and the rematch would happen anyways. the money is always there. They also have Canelo Alvarez and other Champions. In most cases with fights ending in a controversial DRAW or a robbery like Murata vs N’Dam, were ordered immediate rematches by the WBA. Anybody that watched Murata vs N’Dam could say that was a robbery and nothing close to Wilder Fury.
UFTC is your calling! Ultimate Fighting Transgendered Championship!
It does for a title shot, at least til he has a couple of good wins under his belt.Dont think 1 loss at the very top makes anyone irrelevant lol.
Why? Cos I love big slugfest knock out displays. Yeah Fury did brilliant BUT a fight with Fury wouldn't be nearly as exciting as the war that Wilder vs Joshua would be.Why would you want Wilder Joshua when Fury was not only the star but won in pretty much 95% of the people's minds? I just want to know who the best is.
For a title shot yeah he will be irrelevant until he gets some good high level wins in against other contenders. He can't suddenly get a title shot off a loss.How does Wilder become almost irrelevant if he loses? A guy like Parker, who is a much smaller name than Wilder now, is still very much relevant after a loss to Joshua and a mediocre Whyte, yet Wilder would be irrelevant after one loss to Fury or Joshua? Doesn't make any sense.