Weirdo Director David Lynch ' Trump might go down as one of the greatest presidents in history'

TidWell

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
26,525
Reaction score
5,764
I believe Lynch is becoming senile, he is a real creepy guy director according to what people have told in the comments, so add another mental ill person praising Trump alongside Roseanne barr and Kanye West.

olygal 58 minutes ago
David Lynch is such a creepy freak, no surprise he loves our Commander in Chief of Creepy Freaks.

To some observers, Lynch’s comments might have been harder to parse, like just about everything associated with the director.

“He could go down as one of the greatest presidents in history because he has disrupted the thing so much. No one is able to counter this guy in an intelligent way,”
Lynch told the newspaper. “Our so-called leaders can’t take the country forward, can’t get anything done. Like children, they are. Trump has shown all this.”

He told the Guardian that he supported Sen. Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primary and probably voted on the Libertarian ticket in the general election. The Guardian noted that “While Trump may not be doing a good job himself, Lynch thinks, he is opening up a space where other outsiders might.” The newspaper did not provide any quotes to back up the statement.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...res-why/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.4b9676d2679a
 
Last edited:
Doesn't that elitist Bezos own the failing washington post?
FAKE NEWS
 
Well, even Henry Kissinger said this.

The comments by Lynch and Kissinger are based on a depth of understanding about the world's issues, that the common masses won't be able to understand though.

To a large number of the population, Trump is the be-all and end-all, the beginning and the end of everything, the here and now, when there'll be plenty of life beyond Trump. What truly matters is that Trump is bringing mobility to an inert space. He is making change possible by challenging nearly all of the expected norms in politics, and in the public space in general.

Where that movement will take the United States, and the world, is not necessarily determined by Trump's own ideals. Unless, of course, people allow it to be.
 
Last edited:
Liberals be like:

th
 
So Lynch supported Bernie Sanders, voted libertarian (probably), and praises Trump? That is one confused motherfucker.
 
So Lynch supported Bernie Sanders, voted libertarian (probably), and praises Trump? That is one confused motherfucker.
Yeah, he’s a bit all over the place. Regardless of your political affiliations, this isn’t a guy that anyone should want to tout as a spokesman for their organization.
 
So Lynch supported Bernie Sanders, voted libertarian (probably), and praises Trump? That is one confused motherfucker.

If he ever wants a Bernie Sanders to become a president, then he will first need a Donald Trump. It makes perfect sense to give credit to Trump, when its due, as an advocate of Sanders. Not for his politics, but because he is the bulldozer that America desperately needed, to destroy a stagnant hegemony.

We already saw what happened when it was Sanders alone, with no precedent, going against the establishment. He had no chance. But in the post-Trump era, everybody has a chance. A random guy off the street has a chance, if they follow the blueprint.

The inert space commanded by the two established parties, has been broken irreparably by Trump's ascension. It leaves much, much more room for people like Sanders to operate, in the future, without simply being cast aside due to their "eccentric, anti-establishment politics".

After Trump has been tarnished with basically every negative trait imaginable, rapist, fascist, racist, homophobe, transphobe, Islamophobe, will anybody care about some dude being marked as a "socialist" or "atheist"? Probably not.
 
Last edited:
If he ever wants a Bernie Sanders to become a president, then he will first need a Donald Trump. It makes perfect sense to give credit to Trump, when its due, as an advocate of Sanders. Not for his politics, but because he is the bulldozer that America desperately needed, to destroy a stagnant hegemony.

We already saw what happened when it was Sanders alone, with no precedent, going against the establishment. He had no chance. But in the post-Trump era, everybody has a chance. A random guy off the street has a chance, if they follow the blueprint.

The inert space commanded by the two established parties, has been broken irreparably by Trump's ascension. It leaves much, much more room for people like Sanders to operate, in the future, without simply being cast aside due to their "eccentric, anti-establishment politics".
Sooo if I understand what you're saying, Bernie Sanders needed Trump in the same way Colby Covington needed Conor?
 
If he ever wants a Bernie Sanders to become a president, then he will first need a Donald Trump. It makes perfect sense to give credit to Trump, when its due, as an advocate of Sanders. Not for his politics, but because he is the bulldozer that America desperately needed, to destroy a stagnant hegemony.

We already saw what happened when it was Sanders alone, with no precedent, going against the establishment. He had no chance. But in the post-Trump era, everybody has a chance. A random guy off the street has a chance, if they follow the blueprint.

The inert space commanded by the two established parties, has been broken irreparably by Trump's ascension. It leaves much, much more room for people like Sanders to operate, in the future, without simply being cast aside due to their "eccentric, anti-establishment politics".

After Trump has been tarnished with basically every negative trait imaginable, rapist, fascist, racist, homophobe, transphobe, Islamophobe, will anybody care about some dude being marked as a "socialist" or "atheist"? Probably not.
 
Sooo if I understand what you're saying, Bernie Sanders needed Trump in the same way Colby Covington needed Conor?

Basically he needed someone else to set the standard. Or more so, to eradicate the standards.

A Bernie Sanders cannot be a Donald Trump. He is not a bulldozer under a human disguise. He is not the kind of a man that's going to consciously destroy all the expected norms imaginable due to his massive ego and inability to admit a loss. If he "loses", even if it is a loss fixed from the very beginning, he will accept it, and move on.

That's great, but that is not what America needed at this time. They needed someone who could successfully over-turn American politics, upside down, and then some. Trump happened to be the guy to do that.

Will he do damage? Yes, but that is essentially what was expected of him. He was a "fuck you" to American politics, and a "fuck you" is not an actual solution to a problem. But it can be a start. The message has been sent, and how that message will be deciphered (not only by the left, but the right), is what's going to matter, in the end.

If it means a return to the norms, the Bush and the Clintons, then more of such messages will be coming.
 
Last edited:
So, the opinions of actors and movie directors are shit and they should fuck the fuck up and know their place, until one says something seemingly positive about Trump, it gets a Breitbart article that misses the larger point of Lynch's musings, then Trump tweets about it, and then you Trumpleforeskins celebrate it because it seems to confirm your worldview.

"He is undecided about Donald Trump. “He could go down as one of the greatest presidents in history because he has disrupted the thing so much. No one is able to counter this guy in an intelligent way.” While Trump may not be doing a good job himself, Lynch thinks, he is opening up a space where other outsiders might. “Our so-called leaders can’t take the country forward, can’t get anything done. Like children, they are. Trump has shown all this.”

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/jun/23/david-lynch-gotta-be-selfish-twin-peaks
 
So Lynch supported Bernie Sanders, voted libertarian (probably), and praises Trump? That is one confused motherfucker.
Seems more like he thinks America needs someone to shake things up rather than any particular political platform
 
Seems more like he thinks America needs someone to shake things up rather than any particular political platform
Yeah @TheGreatA made that point and I think it's a valid point of view. Still I think that that if you're going to bust up a system then you need a coherent and consistent set of policy initiatives to replace the dismantled system. In this specific case Lynch doesn't seem to have any idea what alternative he prefers in backing such a contradictory set of ideas.

I agree with what you're saying though in case that isn't clear.

Also I've never forgiven Lynch for Eraserhead so I'm not inclined to compliment him.:D
 
Being a Bernie/Trump guy seems about in Lynch's wheelhouse. Weirdo indeed.
 
Lynch is a little nuanced so it can be difficult knowing exactly what he means.
 
Back
Top